public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from October 2015 by thread

ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? Holger Knublauch (Friday, 30 October)

shapes-ACTION-30: Send email to group with unclear "satisfied by's" RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 29 October)

ISSUE-95 PROPOSAL: Clarify the spec. Make a distinction between built-ins and extensions. Stop claiming that built-ins are templates. If an implementation wants to use the template mechanism for built-ins, that's ok but that's not part of the spec. Arthur Ryman (Thursday, 29 October)

ISSUE-95 PROPOSAL: Define the extension mechanism with minimal dependency on an underlying and undocumented class hierarchy. RDFS is not UML. Arthur Ryman (Thursday, 29 October)

ISSUE-95 PROPOSAL: A SHACL process shall inject a property constraint for all instances of some suitable property template class, e.g. sh:PropertyConstraintTemplate. Arthur Ryman (Thursday, 29 October)

shapes-ISSUE-108 (operations): Should operations be specified? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 29 October)

shapes-ISSUE-107 (annotations v. arguments): annotations and arguments use different mechanisms for specifying the SPARQL variable name [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 29 October)

shapes-ISSUE-106 (annotation properties): Annotation properties are not defined well [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 29 October)

shapes-ISSUE-105 (defined prefixes): SHACL SPARQL constraints depend on namespaces in a graph, which is not defined [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 29 October)

RDF Data Shapes 29 October 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 28 October)

ISSUE-95: Template Simplifications Arthur Ryman (Wednesday, 28 October)

Requirements and SHACL Karen Coyle (Wednesday, 28 October)

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 22 October 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Monday, 26 October)

Arguments are ordered? Vladimir Alexiev (Saturday, 24 October)

DISTINCT in sparql definitions Vladimir Alexiev (Saturday, 24 October)

why use rdf:List? Vladimir Alexiev (Saturday, 24 October)

shapes-ISSUE-104 (Union ranges): Should sh:datatype and sh:class have better support for OR? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 23 October)

Proposals page Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 22 October)

Connecting SHACL to Requirements Karen Coyle (Thursday, 22 October)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 22 October 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 21 October)

shapes-ISSUE-103 (Syntax simplifications): Can we further simplify the syntax of some constraint types? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 19 October)

A Modest Proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 16 October)

AW: ISSUE-98 (cont'd): Further syntax improvements Simon Steyskal (Friday, 16 October)

ISSUE-98 (cont'd): Further syntax improvements Holger Knublauch (Friday, 16 October)

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 15 October 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Thursday, 15 October)

Proposal to close ISSUE-102 leaving this to other syntaxes Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 15 October)

Proposal to close ISSUE-84 Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 15 October)

ISSUE-95: Is sh:scopeClass overloaded? Arthur Ryman (Thursday, 15 October)

Re: Editing examples Arthur Ryman (Thursday, 15 October)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 15 October 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 14 October)

paper on recursive SPARQL at ISWC Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 14 October)

shapes-ISSUE-102 (Specifying defaults): Some defaults cannot be explicitly coded [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 14 October)

ISSUE-61 proposed resolution Dimitris Kontokostas (Wednesday, 14 October)

Comments on SHACL, especially regarding compatibility with OSLC Resource Shapes 2.0 Jim Amsden (Monday, 12 October)

Re: Suggested redesign of Operations section Arthur Ryman (Sunday, 11 October)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-94 (hsolbrig): Should RDF syntax requirements be separated from SHACL semantics [SHACL Spec] Arthur Ryman (Sunday, 11 October)

Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86 Dimitris Kontokostas (Friday, 9 October)

Call for Exclusions: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Xueyuan Jia (Friday, 9 October)

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 8 October 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Thursday, 8 October)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-57 (labra): Grouping of Shapes [SHACL Spec] Simon Steyskal (Thursday, 8 October)

SHACL First Public Working Draft published! Arnaud Le Hors (Thursday, 8 October)

shapes-ISSUE-101 (templates as classes): use of rdfs:subClassOf for template inheritance RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 8 October)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-93 (hsolbrig): SHACL engine vs. SHACL instance requirements [SHACL Spec] Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 8 October)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 8 October 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 7 October)

shapes-ISSUE-100 (sh:index): Proposal to allow (optional) sh:index for property constraints [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 7 October)

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 1 October 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Friday, 2 October)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-95 (Template Simplifications): Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism [SHACL Spec] Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 2 October)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-96 (Violation IDs): Should the validation results contain stable IDs to indicate the type of violation [SHACL Spec] Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 2 October)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-97 (sh:derivedValues): Proposal to define constraints using derived values [SHACL Spec] Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 2 October)

shapes-ISSUE-99 (special cases): special treatment of rdfs:Resource and rdf:List in sh:valueClass (and possibly elsewhere) [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 2 October)

speeding up the working group Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 2 October)

sh:maxCount 0 Karen Coyle (Friday, 2 October)

shapes-ISSUE-98 (Node constraints): Proposal to generalize property constraints into node constraints [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 2 October)

regrets Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 1 October)

Re: Proposal for "Repeated Property" Requirement - sh:partition Iovka Boneva (Thursday, 1 October)

DCMI tests - help needed Karen Coyle (Thursday, 1 October)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-86 (dimitris): Associating shapes with ontologies or vocabularies [SHACL Spec] Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 1 October)

Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 1 October 2015 (ISSUE-91) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 1 October)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-90 (Literal focus nodes): Can the focus node be a literal? [SHACL Spec] Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 1 October)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-89 (recursion without properties): How should recursion that does not involve a property be handled? [SHACL Spec] Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 1 October)

Re: UCR WD published! Arthur Ryman (Thursday, 1 October)

Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 1 October 2015 Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 1 October)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 October 2015 14:47:09 UTC