Re: DCMI tests - help needed

> You may have missed:
> 
> The core vocabulary includes an instance of sh:ClosedShapeConstraint 
> called
> sh:Closed that can be used in places where no other arguments such as
> sh:ignoredProperties are needed.

you are totally right, thanks for the pointer!

Anyway, since Karen's examples use e.g. sh:nodeshape the verbose 
representation should be used, right?

regards,
simon

---
DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna

www: http://www.steyskal.info/  twitter: @simonsteys

Am 2015-10-01 12:52, schrieb Peter F. Patel-Schneider:
> On 10/01/2015 03:36 AM, Simon Steyskal wrote:
> 
> [...]
>> 
>> 1) To indicate that a shape should be interpreted as a closed shape 
>> you have
>> to use:
>> 
>> ex:ClosedShapeExampleShape
>>     a sh:Shape ;
>>     sh:constraint [
>>         a sh:ClosedShapeConstraint ;
>>         sh:ignoredProperties (sh:nodeShape rdf:type) ;
>>     ] ;
>>     sh:property [
>>         ....
>> 
>> and not "sh:constraint sh:Closed ;" see [1]
>> (unless we've agreed on some abbreviated representation I'm not aware 
>> of)
> 
> [...]
> 
> You may have missed:
> 
> The core vocabulary includes an instance of sh:ClosedShapeConstraint 
> called
> sh:Closed that can be used in places where no other arguments such as
> sh:ignoredProperties are needed.
> 
> although sh:Closed does not work the same way as your example does.
> 
> peter

Received on Thursday, 1 October 2015 11:11:56 UTC