- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:48:45 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
It basically means that the node must be *member of* the given list. When used via sh:constraint (as below) it means that all nodes where the shape applies to must be members of this set - if the shape is validated against ex:Blue then a violation is fired. When used via sh:property this means that all values must be members of the list. Holger On 10/17/15 10:42 AM, Karen Coyle wrote: > Sorry, I've forgotten what we said "in" means - one of? any of? > > kc > > On 10/15/15 1:55 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >> Following today's resolution on ISSUE-98, I propose to close ISSUE-84 >> using sh:in, e.g. >> >> ex:TrafficLightColors >> a sh:Shape ; >> sh:constraint [ >> sh:in (ex:Green ex:Red ex:Yellow) >> ] . >> >> I also suspect we may now close ISSUE-88 using the node constraints from >> ISSUE-98, but this would need to be confirmed by Jose. >> >> Holger >> >> >> >
Received on Saturday, 17 October 2015 02:49:17 UTC