- From: Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:37:39 +0300
- To: public-data-shapes-wg <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 9 October 2015 07:38:38 UTC
A proposal to resolve Issue 86 is the following For ontology / vocabulary designers who want to associate shapes with their ontology definition the spec will suggest the following 3 means of association: 1) the shapes will be written in the same document with the ontology 2) the shapes graph will be imported using owl:imports 3) the shapes graph will be linked from the ontology / vocabulary IRI with the property sh:schemaShapes The spec will additionally mention the effects of options (1)/(2) compared to (3). Best, Dimtiris -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig & DBpedia Association Events: http://wiki.dbpedia.org/meetings/California2015 (Nov 5th) Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://rdfunit.aksw.org, http:// http://aligned-project.eu Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas Research Group: http://aksw.org
Received on Friday, 9 October 2015 07:38:38 UTC