Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 1 October 2015 (ISSUE-91)

I vote -1 on any proposal to make any "default" in SHACL be other than a
construct that has no consequences.

So, -1 on a proposal that makes 1 be the default value for sh:minCardinality,
-1 on a propoposal that makes 1 be the default value for sh:maxCardinality, etc.

I vote +1 for the proposal in
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2015Sep/0162.html
and any proposal in accordance with  "I believe if something is left
unspecified then it should count as
unconstrained."  in that message.


peter

Received on Thursday, 1 October 2015 02:08:42 UTC