- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:46:08 -0700
- To: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Thanks to Peter and Holger, we have a very good analysis of the requirements and SHACL functions. I think that Simon and I can add these to the UCR document.[1] I still intend to do a quick comparison of SHACL to requirements to see if we have SHACL features that would benefit from a use case. There are a few outstanding issues revealed by the comparison. We can review those after the merging is done. kc [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1whx2DeJtng-WZXo2DAHc_GZL7ElXNS_B8fBxarGA-0o/ -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Wednesday, 28 October 2015 16:46:40 UTC