Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-84

Thanks Peter and Holger. Can someone either point to the relevant use 
case/requirement, or provide a use case for this? (Or a story, for that 
matter.) I admit it doesn't immediately resonate with me as something 
we've previously discussed.

kc

On 10/17/15 6:18 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> My understanding is that sh:hasValue is different from sh:allowedValues.
>
> The first says that a value must be present among the property values.  The
> second says that all property values must belong to the allowed values.
>
> peter
>
>
> On 10/17/2015 12:31 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:
>> Will this also be used for lists of one value? I ask because I was noticing
>> that the current draft has sh:hasValue as well as sh:allowedValues, even
>> though logically a list of one is ... one. It would make sense to me that if
>> there is only one possible value (which doesn't sound to me like a common
>> case, but perhaps it is in other environments) users would not have to use a
>> different property. That's a decision/switch that a program can make for the
>> user.
>>
>> kc
>>
>> On 10/16/15 7:48 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>>> It basically means that the node must be *member of* the given list.
>>> When used via sh:constraint (as below) it means that all nodes where the
>>> shape applies to must be members of this set - if the shape is validated
>>> against ex:Blue then a violation is fired. When used via sh:property
>>> this means that all values must be members of the list.
>>>
>>> Holger
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/17/15 10:42 AM, Karen Coyle wrote:
>>>> Sorry, I've forgotten what we said "in" means - one of? any of?
>>>>
>>>> kc
>>>>
>>>> On 10/15/15 1:55 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>>>>> Following today's resolution on ISSUE-98, I propose to close ISSUE-84
>>>>> using sh:in, e.g.
>>>>>
>>>>> ex:TrafficLightColors
>>>>>       a sh:Shape ;
>>>>>       sh:constraint [
>>>>>           sh:in (ex:Green ex:Red ex:Yellow)
>>>>>       ] .
>>>>>
>>>>> I also suspect we may now close ISSUE-88 using the node constraints from
>>>>> ISSUE-98, but this would need to be confirmed by Jose.
>>>>>
>>>>> Holger
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600

Received on Sunday, 18 October 2015 15:08:04 UTC