public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from October 2015 by subject

A Modest Proposal

Arguments are ordered?

AW: ISSUE-98 (cont'd): Further syntax improvements

Call for Exclusions: Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL)

Comments on SHACL, especially regarding compatibility with OSLC Resource Shapes 2.0

Connecting SHACL to Requirements

DCMI tests - help needed

DISTINCT in sparql definitions

Editing examples

Functions invocation

Functions invocation (was: ISSUE-95: Template Simplifications)

ISSUE-61 (was: Comments on SHACL, especially regarding compatibility with OSLC Resource Shapes 2.0)

ISSUE-61 proposed resolution

ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all?

ISSUE-92 [Was: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 8 October 2015]

ISSUE-95 PROPOSAL: A SHACL process shall inject a property constraint for all instances of some suitable property template class, e.g. sh:PropertyConstraintTemplate.

ISSUE-95 PROPOSAL: Clarify the spec. Make a distinction between built-ins and extensions. Stop claiming that built-ins are templates. If an implementation wants to use the template mechanism for built-ins, that's ok but that's not part of the spec.

ISSUE-95 PROPOSAL: Define the extension mechanism with minimal dependency on an underlying and undocumented class hierarchy. RDFS is not UML.

ISSUE-95: Is sh:scopeClass overloaded?

ISSUE-95: Template Simplifications

ISSUE-98 (cont'd): Further syntax improvements

On how to deal with issues (was ISSUE-98 (cont'd): Further syntax improvements)

On using the Proposal page (was Re: ISSUE-95: Template Simplifications)

paper on recursive SPARQL at ISWC

Proposal for "Repeated Property" Requirement - sh:partition

Proposal to close ISSUE-102 leaving this to other syntaxes

Proposal to close ISSUE-84

Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86

Proposals page

RDF Data Shapes 29 October 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 1 October 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 1 October 2015 (ISSUE-91)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 15 October 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 22 October 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 8 October 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 1 October 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 15 October 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 22 October 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 8 October 2015

regrets

Requirements and SHACL

sh:maxCount 0

sh:Template needed? (was: ISSUE-95: Template Simplifications)

SHACL First Public Working Draft published!

shapes-ACTION-30: Send email to group with unclear "satisfied by's"

shapes-ISSUE-100 (sh:index): Proposal to allow (optional) sh:index for property constraints [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-101 (templates as classes): use of rdfs:subClassOf for template inheritance

shapes-ISSUE-102 (Specifying defaults): Some defaults cannot be explicitly coded [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-103 (Syntax simplifications): Can we further simplify the syntax of some constraint types? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-104 (Union ranges): Should sh:datatype and sh:class have better support for OR? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-105 (defined prefixes): SHACL SPARQL constraints depend on namespaces in a graph, which is not defined [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-106 (annotation properties): Annotation properties are not defined well [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-107 (annotations v. arguments): annotations and arguments use different mechanisms for specifying the SPARQL variable name [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-108 (operations): Should operations be specified? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-57 (labra): Grouping of Shapes [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-86 (dimitris): Associating shapes with ontologies or vocabularies [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-89 (recursion without properties): How should recursion that does not involve a property be handled? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-90 (Literal focus nodes): Can the focus node be a literal? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-93 (hsolbrig): SHACL engine vs. SHACL instance requirements [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-94 (hsolbrig): Should RDF syntax requirements be separated from SHACL semantics [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-95 (Template Simplifications): Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-96 (Violation IDs): Should the validation results contain stable IDs to indicate the type of violation [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-97 (sh:derivedValues): Proposal to define constraints using derived values [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-98 (Node constraints): Proposal to generalize property constraints into node constraints [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-99 (special cases): special treatment of rdfs:Resource and rdf:List in sh:valueClass (and possibly elsewhere) [SHACL Spec]

speeding up the working group

Suggested redesign of Operations section

UCR WD published!

why use rdf:List?

Last message date: Saturday, 31 October 2015 14:47:09 UTC