Re: shapes-ISSUE-107 (annotations v. arguments): annotations and arguments use different mechanisms for specifying the SPARQL variable name [SHACL Spec] from Arthur Ryman on 2015-10-29 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from October 2015)

From: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:51:57 -0400
To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAApBiO=YjSuqwdZQjfqFzeOb67mMVLycFmSE=6q+EffQaGpnug@mail.gmail.com>

+1

Also, the definition of the local name of results in an NCName. This
is safe as a SPARQL variable. I assume it is safe enough for
Javascript.

-- Arthur

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:58 PM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue
Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
> shapes-ISSUE-107 (annotations v. arguments): annotations and arguments use different mechanisms for specifying the SPARQL variable name [SHACL Spec]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/107
>
> Raised by: Peter Patel-Schneider
> On product: SHACL Spec
>
> Annotation properties use sh:annotationVarName to provide the SPARQL variable name to use.  Arguments use the local part of their IRI.  It would be better to have one mechanism.
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 29 October 2015 20:52:24 UTC