- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 07:13:32 -0700
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
On 10/2/15 6:00 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > sh:maxCount 0 > sh:maxCount -1 > according to the definition(s) in 3.1.5. Why single out 0 as needing special > treatment as it is in no way special? Because min 0 means that there is no minimum, but max 0 does not mean that there is no maximum. Now, that may not be the way it works out mathematically, but that's a logical way to say it in words. And I have no idea what should be expected with max -n, but if it doesn't lead to a meaningful operation within the context of SHACL then a user might expect it to be flagged as an error. kc -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Friday, 2 October 2015 14:14:01 UTC