I have improved the wording of this and added the missing details. https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/compare/da0f0fbdc4...8e8401ab9d Holger On 10/29/2015 12:32, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > shapes-ISSUE-106 (annotation properties): Annotation properties are not defined well [SHACL Spec] > > http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/106 > > Raised by: Peter Patel-Schneider > On product: SHACL Spec > > 6.2.3 mentions sh:annotationValue, but the use of this property is not specified. > > 6.2.3 allows sh:annotationVarName to be missing but the behaviour in this case is not specified. > > > > >Received on Friday, 30 October 2015 05:42:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:27 UTC