- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 07:02:50 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
I believe having a way to specify unbounded maxCount and open shapes in RDF triples is unnecessary and has more costs than benefits. We should keep the language consistent - if nothing is stated then nothing is constrained. If we do such defaults for maxCount then the same would be expected for all other constraint types. However, other syntaxes and user interface tools may display this information, i.e. your option 3). Proposal: Close ISSUE-102 stating that no changes to the RDF data model of SHACL are done but other languages such as a Compact Syntax may include things like [0..*] Holger
Received on Thursday, 15 October 2015 21:03:32 UTC