Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 1 October 2015

On 09/30/2015 05:06 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
> On 10/1/2015 9:36, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
>> Unfortunately with Arthur out we won't be able to discuss additive repeated
>> properties so I selected a few other issues I hope we can make progress on.
>> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2015.10.01
>> --
>> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - IBM
>> Software Group
>>
> 
> Hi Arnaud,
> 
> if somehow possible, I would like to see whether anyone disagrees with
> 
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2015Sep/0128.html
> 
> This is more general than the repeated properties question and would fit well
> with the discussion on ISSUE-90.
> 
> Furthermore, I would appreciate if anyone has feedback on ISSUE-95, which
> feels like a hopefully non-controversial simplification.
> 
> Sorry for being pushy and impatient on this, but I have both topics
> implemented on branches right now, which makes further clean up tasks
> difficult and too speculative.
> 
> In exchange, I would push back ISSUE-77 and ISSUE-82 as they are rather
> uncritical details.
> 
> Thanks,
> Holger

I don't think that the changes in
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2015Sep/0128.html
speak to the difference between additive and conjunctive interpretations of
repeated properties.  If that is supposed to be what they resolve then I don't
think that they are the right way to go at all.

The changes in
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2015Sep/0128.html
appear to speak much more to better support for literals a focus nodes.  They
do seem to be a reasonable start at the changes required for this purpose and
maybe for a general rationalization of the constructs in SHACL.  They
certainly resolve ISSUE-84 and ISSUE-88.

peter

Received on Thursday, 1 October 2015 04:20:58 UTC