- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 14:28:33 -0700
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
I'd be more in favor of this solution if I saw evidence that there will be a compact syntax that provides this. Note that the requirement for min/max reads: 4.2.1 R5.2: Property Min/Max Cardinality The stated values for a property may be limited by minimum/maximum cardinality, with typical patterns being [0..1], [1..1], [0..*] and [1..*]. If this wasn't to be included in SHACL as stated, then the group should have discussed and accepted this change. If we had, it would have been solved by now. Unfortunately, it is now "carved in code" which makes changing more difficult. I'm working on a table comparing the requirements to the SHACL draft (which will need input from others).[1] I'd like to make clear what is in the requirements that is different from the draft, and what is in the draft that is not in the requirements. The requirements state the mind of the group at that time, and we can discuss additions or changes, but we should keep them in the process. kc [1]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1whx2DeJtng-WZXo2DAHc_GZL7ElXNS_B8fBxarGA-0o - in a Google doc now because I didn't want to put it on the wiki until i had experimented a bit. has requirements, some SHACL functions, lots of question marks On 10/15/15 2:02 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > I believe having a way to specify unbounded maxCount and open shapes in > RDF triples is unnecessary and has more costs than benefits. We should > keep the language consistent - if nothing is stated then nothing is > constrained. If we do such defaults for maxCount then the same would be > expected for all other constraint types. However, other syntaxes and > user interface tools may display this information, i.e. your option 3). > > Proposal: Close ISSUE-102 stating that no changes to the RDF data model > of SHACL are done but other languages such as a Compact Syntax may > include things like [0..*] > > Holger > > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Saturday, 17 October 2015 21:29:09 UTC