- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 07:09:44 -0700
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 10/9/15 4:19 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > Also, some people will put everything into one file (option 1) so our > tools need to live with that situation anyway. There is no harm in > having the shapes as data. For some use cases, shapes *are* data. Putting shapes in the graph will be awkward (at best) when the shape is closed. It would require one to write an ignore statement that includes every shape property used. That leads me to conclude, by the way, that the ignore function might need to work on namesapaces, not just individual properties. And, of course, that doesn't work for the base namespace. kc -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Sunday, 11 October 2015 14:10:15 UTC