Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 1 October 2015 (ISSUE-91)

On 9/30/15 7:08 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> I vote +1 for the proposal in
> and any proposal in accordance with  "I believe if something is left
> unspecified then it should count as
> unconstrained."  in that message.

What is the / is there a / interaction between unconstrained and the use 
of closed shapes? I'm thinking of properties with no declared 
constraints, and whether there is a different result with open or closed 
shapes. Conceptually there is a big difference in my mind - with an open 
shape, the property with no declared constraints is no different from a 
property that is not included in the shape definition; with a closed 
shape, the property with no declared constraints is an optional 
property, and does not trigger a validation error.


Karen Coyle
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600

Received on Thursday, 1 October 2015 10:24:36 UTC