ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2023 by author

Amaury Denoyelle

• Re: New draft: Reverse HTTP Transport (Thursday, 13 July)

Asbjørn Ulsberg

• Re: Server push - use cases (Monday, 14 August)

Austin William Wright

• Re: Existing implementations of the resumable upload draft (Thursday, 27 July)

Ben Schwartz

• Re: [Masque] HTTP Upgrade Request Smuggling Draft (Friday, 8 September)
• HTTP Upgrade Request Smuggling Draft (Monday, 21 August)

Benjamin Schwartz

• New draft: Reverse HTTP Transport (Tuesday, 11 July)

Cory Benfield

• Re: Can servers generate responses to malformed requests in h2? (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: How to handle "101 Switching Protocols in H2 or H3" (Thursday, 17 August)

Daniel Stenberg

• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9112 (7633) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: Request Speculation (Response Prediction) (Monday, 14 August)

David Schinazi

• Re: [Masque] HTTP Upgrade Request Smuggling Draft (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: New draft: Reverse HTTP Transport (Thursday, 20 July)

Dragana Damjanovic

• Re: WebSockets and masking (Thursday, 6 July)

Eric Gorbaty

• Re: Secondary certificates for HTTP servers (Wednesday, 26 July)
• Re: Secondary certificates for HTTP servers (Tuesday, 25 July)
• Re: Secondary certificates for HTTP servers (Monday, 17 July)
• Re: Secondary certificates for HTTP servers (Thursday, 6 July)
• Re: Secondary certificates for HTTP servers (Wednesday, 5 July)
• Secondary certificates for HTTP servers (Saturday, 1 July)

Eric J Bowman

• Re: RFC 9205 vs. CL0P (Friday, 25 August)
• Re: RFC 9205 vs. CL0P (Wednesday, 23 August)
• Re: RFC 9205 vs. CL0P (Monday, 21 August)
• Re: RFC 9205 vs. CL0P (Monday, 21 August)
• Re: RFC 9205 vs. CL0P (Saturday, 19 August)
• Re: RFC 9205 vs. CL0P (Saturday, 19 August)
• Re: New draft: Reverse HTTP Transport (Sunday, 16 July)
• Re: RFC 9205 vs. CL0P (Friday, 7 July)
• Re: RFC 9205 vs. CL0P (Friday, 7 July)

Eric Kinnear

• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary (Monday, 14 August)

Evert Pot

• Re: HTTP Deprecation Call for Authors (Thursday, 24 August)
• Re: Two new HTTP caching specifications (Friday, 21 July)

Francesca Palombini

• FW: Proposal for Consolidating Parts of the ART & TSV Areas (Tuesday, 19 September)

Glenn Strauss

• Re: Can servers generate responses to malformed requests in h2? (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: Can servers generate responses to malformed requests in h2? (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: Can servers generate responses to malformed requests in h2? (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: Server push - use cases (Tuesday, 15 August)

Greg Wilkins

• Re: Server push - use cases (Monday, 14 August)

Guoye Zhang

• Content-Disposition missing from IANA HTTP field name registry (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: Request Speculation (Response Prediction) (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: Feedback on Availability Hints from Apple client perspective (Thursday, 3 August)
• Re: Feedback on Availability Hints from Apple client perspective (Sunday, 30 July)
• Feedback on Availability Hints from Apple client perspective (Sunday, 30 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload-01 (Thursday, 27 July)
• Re: HTTP Resumable Uploads on Apple Platforms (Sunday, 9 July)

Hewitt, Rory

• New Internet Draft: The qpack_static_table_version TLS extension (Monday, 25 September)
• RE: [TLS] New Internet Draft: The qpack_static_table_version TLS extension (Wednesday, 27 September)

IETF Meeting Session Request Tool

• httpbis - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 118 (Tuesday, 22 August)

Ilari Liusvaara

• Re: http: Diagnostic instead of reason codes Q (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: Ambiguity about how to deal with received fragments in URI (Thursday, 27 July)
• Re: Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 (Thursday, 6 July)
• Re: Secondary certificates for HTTP servers (Thursday, 6 July)
• Re: Secondary certificates for HTTP servers (Saturday, 1 July)

internet-drafts@ietf.org

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00.txt (Monday, 11 September)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-03.txt (Friday, 4 August)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-19.txt (Thursday, 27 July)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-18.txt (Sunday, 23 July)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-13.txt (Monday, 10 July)

Julian Reschke

• Re: http: Diagnostic instead of reason codes Q (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: Ambiguity about how to deal with received fragments in URI (Thursday, 27 July)

Justin Richer

• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-18.txt (Thursday, 27 July)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-18.txt (Monday, 24 July)
• Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Sunday, 23 July)
• Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Sunday, 23 July)

K Tirumaleswar Reddy (Nokia)

• RE: New draft: Reverse HTTP Transport (Friday, 14 July)
• RE: New draft: Reverse HTTP Transport (Thursday, 13 July)

Kyzer Davis (kydavis)

• RE: HTTP Deprecation Call for Authors (Thursday, 10 August)

Lucas Pardue

• Re: [TLS] New Internet Draft: The qpack_static_table_version TLS extension (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: Can servers generate responses to malformed requests in h2? (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: Can servers generate responses to malformed requests in h2? (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: Can servers generate responses to malformed requests in h2? (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: Can servers generate responses to malformed requests in h2? (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [IANA #1280425] Re: Content-Disposition missing from IANA HTTP field name registry (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: Content-Disposition missing from IANA HTTP field name registry (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: http: Diagnostic instead of reason codes Q (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: How to handle "101 Switching Protocols in H2 or H3" (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload-01 (Wednesday, 9 August)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload-01 (Wednesday, 9 August)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload-01 (Thursday, 27 July)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload-01 (Thursday, 27 July)
• Re: Secondary certificates for HTTP servers (Wednesday, 26 July)
• Re: Secondary certificates for HTTP servers (Tuesday, 25 July)
• Re: New draft: Reverse HTTP Transport (Thursday, 20 July)
• Re: New draft: Reverse HTTP Transport (Thursday, 13 July)
• Re: New draft: Reverse HTTP Transport (Thursday, 13 July)
• Re: Pseudo Headers in Binary Representation of HTTP Messages (RFC 9292) (Thursday, 6 July)
• Re: Secondary certificates for HTTP servers (Thursday, 6 July)
• Re: Secondary certificates for HTTP servers (Thursday, 6 July)
• Re: Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 (Tuesday, 4 July)

Marius Kleidl

• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload-01 (Wednesday, 9 August)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload-01 (Wednesday, 9 August)
• Existing implementations of the resumable upload draft (Tuesday, 25 July)
• Re: HTTP Resumable Uploads on Apple Platforms (Sunday, 9 July)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: Content-Disposition missing from IANA HTTP field name registry (Thursday, 7 September)
• FYI: SF Date and Display String tests and implementation (Thursday, 24 August)
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary (Wednesday, 23 August)
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-gateway-description-00.txt (Monday, 21 August)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7599) (Saturday, 12 August)
• Call for Adoption: draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary (Thursday, 10 August)
• Re: Feedback on Availability Hints from Apple client perspective (Thursday, 3 August)
• Re: Feedback on Availability Hints from Apple client perspective (Wednesday, 2 August)
• DRAFT minutes from IETF117 San Francisco (Friday, 28 July)
• Re: Two new HTTP caching specifications (Friday, 21 July)
• Re: draft-soni-protocol-handler-well-known-uri (Tuesday, 11 July)
• Re: draft-soni-protocol-handler-well-known-uri (Tuesday, 11 July)
• Re: Secondary certificates for HTTP servers (Saturday, 1 July)

Mark Nottingham via Datatracker

• Httpdir last call review of draft-ietf-privacypass-protocol-12 (Thursday, 31 August)

Mark Thomas

• Re: Server push - use cases (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Server push - use cases (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: Ambiguity about how to deal with received fragments in URI (Thursday, 27 July)

Marten Seemann

• Re: [TLS] New Internet Draft: The qpack_static_table_version TLS extension (Thursday, 28 September)

Martin J. Dürst

• Re: RFC 9205 vs. CL0P (Wednesday, 23 August)

Martin Thomson

• Re: [TLS] New Internet Draft: The qpack_static_table_version TLS extension (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: Can servers generate responses to malformed requests in h2? (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: Can servers generate responses to malformed requests in h2? (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: Can servers generate responses to malformed requests in h2? (Monday, 25 September)
• Can servers generate responses to malformed requests in h2? (Sunday, 24 September)
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary (Thursday, 10 August)
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary (Thursday, 10 August)
• Re: Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 (Tuesday, 4 July)

Martin Thomson via Datatracker

• Httpdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-14 (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-privacypass-auth-scheme-12 (Wednesday, 30 August)

Matthew Kerwin

• Re: Request Speculation (Response Prediction) (Monday, 14 August)

Michael Sweet

• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9112 (7633) (Wednesday, 6 September)

Mike Bishop

• Re: [TLS] New Internet Draft: The qpack_static_table_version TLS extension (Wednesday, 27 September)
• RE: Server push - use cases (Tuesday, 29 August)
• RE: Secondary certificates for HTTP servers (Tuesday, 25 July)

Mirja Kuehlewind

• FW: [Maprg] Agenda for maprg at 117 (Wednesday, 26 July)

Momoka Yamamoto

• Is simultaneous WebSocket connection requests allowed? (Tuesday, 15 August)

Norman Maurer

• Re: Pseudo Headers in Binary Representation of HTTP Messages (RFC 9292) (Thursday, 6 July)
• Pseudo Headers in Binary Representation of HTTP Messages (RFC 9292) (Wednesday, 5 July)

Patrick Meenan

• Re: HTTP zstd accept-encoding window size (Friday, 15 September)
• HTTP zstd accept-encoding window size (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary (Friday, 18 August)
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary (Thursday, 17 August)
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary (Thursday, 10 August)
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary (Thursday, 10 August)
• Re: Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 (Tuesday, 8 August)
• Re: Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 (Tuesday, 8 August)
• Re: Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 (Tuesday, 8 August)
• Re: Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 (Monday, 10 July)
• Re: Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 (Wednesday, 5 July)
• Re: Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 (Tuesday, 4 July)

Paul Wouters via Datatracker

• Paul Wouters' Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-13: (with COMMENT) (Friday, 14 July)

Poul-Henning Kamp

• Re: RFC 9205 vs. CL0P (Saturday, 19 August)
• [sfbis] Ban "%00" in serialized DisplayString (Thursday, 17 August)

Rahul Gupta

• Fw: Proposal for Per Resource Events Protocol (Tuesday, 29 August)
• Fw: Enquiry about proposing a new specification at IETF (Tuesday, 1 August)

Repository Activity Summary Bot

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 24 September)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 17 September)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 10 September)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 3 September)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 27 August)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 20 August)

RFC Errata System

• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9112 (7633) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7599) (Friday, 11 August)
• [Errata Rejected] RFC9218 (7556) (Monday, 17 July)
• [Errata Rejected] RFC9110 (7530) (Friday, 7 July)

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org

• RFC 9440 on Client-Cert HTTP Header Field (Saturday, 22 July)

Rob Sayre

• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload-01 (Thursday, 27 July)
• draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload-01 (Wednesday, 26 July)

Rory Hewitt

• RE: [TLS] New Internet Draft: The qpack_static_table_version TLS extension (Wednesday, 27 September)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9112 (7633) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary (Thursday, 17 August)

Ryan Globus

• Re: Secondary certificates for HTTP servers (Wednesday, 5 July)

Ryan Hamilton

• Re: How to handle "101 Switching Protocols in H2 or H3" (Tuesday, 22 August)
• How to handle "101 Switching Protocols in H2 or H3" (Wednesday, 16 August)

Sean McArthur

• Re: Can servers generate responses to malformed requests in h2? (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: Ambiguity about how to deal with received fragments in URI (Thursday, 27 July)
• Re: Pseudo Headers in Binary Representation of HTTP Messages (RFC 9292) (Thursday, 6 July)

Seph Gentle

• Re: RFC 9205 vs. CL0P (Tuesday, 22 August)

Shivan Kaul Sahib

• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header (Wednesday, 5 July)

Soni L.

• Re: Request Speculation (Response Prediction) (Tuesday, 15 August)
• Re: Request Speculation (Response Prediction) (Monday, 14 August)
• Request Speculation (Response Prediction) (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: Server push - use cases (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: draft-soni-protocol-handler-well-known-uri (Tuesday, 11 July)
• Re: New draft: Reverse HTTP Transport (Tuesday, 11 July)
• draft-soni-protocol-handler-well-known-uri (Tuesday, 11 July)
• a well-known web-based protocol handler (Tuesday, 11 July)

Stefan Eissing

• Re: Can servers generate responses to malformed requests in h2? (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary (Friday, 18 August)
• Re: Ambiguity about how to deal with received fragments in URI (Thursday, 27 July)

The IESG

• Protocol Action: 'HTTP Message Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-19.txt) (Wednesday, 16 August)
• Protocol Action: 'Digest Fields' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-13.txt) (Tuesday, 25 July)

Toerless Eckert

• Re: http: Diagnostic instead of reason codes Q (Wednesday, 6 September)
• http: Diagnostic instead of reason codes Q (Wednesday, 6 September)

Tommy Pauly

• Re: [Privacy-pass] Httpdir last call review of draft-ietf-privacypass-protocol-12 (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: Secondary certificates for HTTP servers (Tuesday, 25 July)
• Fwd: [Int-area] draft-pauly-intarea-proxy-config-pvd-00 (Monday, 3 July)

Vlad Krasnov

• Re: Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 (Tuesday, 8 August)
• Re: Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 (Tuesday, 8 August)

W. Felix Handte

• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary (Monday, 14 August)

Watson Ladd

• Re: [TLS] New Internet Draft: The qpack_static_table_version TLS extension (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: Feedback on Availability Hints from Apple client perspective (Sunday, 30 July)
• Re: Secondary certificates for HTTP servers (Tuesday, 25 July)
• Re: New draft: Reverse HTTP Transport (Thursday, 20 July)
• Re: New draft: Reverse HTTP Transport (Thursday, 13 July)
• Re: New draft: Reverse HTTP Transport (Tuesday, 11 July)

Willy Tarreau

• Re: Can servers generate responses to malformed requests in h2? (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: Can servers generate responses to malformed requests in h2? (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9112 (7633) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: How to handle "101 Switching Protocols in H2 or H3" (Wednesday, 23 August)
• Re: RFC 9205 vs. CL0P (Saturday, 19 August)
• Re: Server push - use cases (Monday, 14 August)
• Re: Ambiguity about how to deal with received fragments in URI (Thursday, 27 July)
• Ambiguity about how to deal with received fragments in URI (Thursday, 27 July)
• Re: New draft: Reverse HTTP Transport (Thursday, 13 July)

Last message date: Friday, 29 September 2023 09:15:11 UTC