- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 15:54:01 +0200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 27.07.2023 14:17, Sean McArthur wrote: > I agree the handling for a server is ambiguous. In hyper, we've just > ignored including it in `req.uri()`, so user code cannot access it. If > it were clarified in the RFC that we should reject with a 400, we could > consider making that change. > ... RFC 9110, Section 4.2.5 says "not allowed". I believe this is sufficient reason to respond with 400. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 27 July 2023 13:54:09 UTC