- From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 22:08:05 -0700
- To: "Hewitt, Rory" <rhewitt=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, TLS List <tls@ietf.org>, "Bishop, Mike" <mbishop@akamai.com>
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023, 2:44 PM Hewitt, Rory <rhewitt=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Dear HTTP-BIS & TLS folks, <snip> > I would appreciate any comments, positive or negative. Rory, Great to see someone new jump in and the text is pretty clear. I do have one question: why not use the SETTINGS frame? This seems like it would fit there. Also I think IANA isn't equipped to perform that analysis, but it's something the HTTP WG could do and periodically publish a very boring RFC for, or maybe even abuse expert review in the IANA process to get the changes done. I do think something like this is worthwhile in principle, but I wouldn't be surprised if the analysis comes back "HTTP usages haven't changed enough" for a bit. Sincerely, Watson Ladd
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2023 05:08:23 UTC