- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 10:59:04 +1000
- To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
- Cc: Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>, justine@justinekrejcha.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
This was a conscious choice; see: https://github.com/httpwg/httpbis-issues/issues/88 Therefore, this errata should be REJECTED. Cheers, > On 12 Aug 2023, at 3:52 am, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9110, > "HTTP Semantics". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7599 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Justine Krejcha <justine@justinekrejcha.com> > > Section: 6.4.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > All 1xx (Informational), 204 (No Content), and 304 (Not Modified) > responses do not include content. > > All other responses do include content, although that content might > be of zero length. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > All 1xx (Informational), 204 (No Content), 205 (Reset Content), > and 304 (Not Modified) responses do not include content. > > All other responses do include content, although that content might > be of zero length. > > Notes > ----- > Per section 15.3.6 (205 No Content), it says that servers MUST NOT generate a response. Section 6.4.1 says that "All 1xx, 204, and 304 response don't include content and others do." even though 205 response mustn't generate content. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC9110 (draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-19) > -------------------------------------- > Title : HTTP Semantics > Publication Date : June 2022 > Author(s) : R. Fielding, Ed., M. Nottingham, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed. > Category : INTERNET STANDARD > Source : HTTP > Area : Applications and Real-Time > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Saturday, 12 August 2023 00:59:16 UTC