draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers: Digests and Conditional Requests
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
Re: [TLS] something something certificate --- boiling a small lake
- Re: [TLS] something something certificate --- boiling a small lake
- Re: [TLS] something something certificate --- boiling a small lake
Re: something something certificate --- boiling a small lake
HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS
- Re: HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type)
- Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type)
- Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type)
Structured request headers deployment issues
Prefer: return=representation and caching
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
RFC7616 uri= vs request-target etc
Fwd: Working Group Last Call: QUIC protocol drafts
Registration Request for the respond-for HTTP preference
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-19: (with COMMENT)
Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization
- Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization)
- Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-19.txt
One last Structured Fields issue
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
httpbis - Not having a session at IETF 108
DRAFT minutes from the May 2020 Interim
Digest wrap up: validators, algorithm parameters and buggy compression
Cookie-related status updates.
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-08.txt
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-08.txt
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-08.txt
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT)
- Re: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT)
- Re: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT)
Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT)
Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT)
- Re: Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT)
Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT)
Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
- Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
- Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
- Re: Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT)
Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT)
Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT)
Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT)
- Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
- Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
- Boolean param notation, Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
- empty lists, was: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
- Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
- Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Reminder: 1st Virtual Interim session in ~11 hours
Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14.txt
Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT)
Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
Updating HTTP/2 Extensions
HTTP signature standardization attempt in the banking sector.
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-secondary-certs-06.txt
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard
draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values
Re: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
Adoption of Prefer-Push as an experimental submission
Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl
- Re: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl
- Re: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl
- Re: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl
I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers
- Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers
- Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers
- Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers
- Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers
- Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers
- Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers
- Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers
- Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers
- Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers
- Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers
- Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers
- Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers
- Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers
- Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers
- Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers
- Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18
HTTP Priority - proposal to support headers and frames
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13
WG Virtual Meeting announcement: 2020-05-[19,26]
[Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (6149)
Generating a 421 status from a proxy
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13.txt
zstd PMCE for WebSocket
Re: New I-D: The Transport-Info HTTP Header-01
draft-btw-add-rfc8484-clarification: Review Request
Should the HTTP Method change when following a 303 redirect ?
Re: New I-D: Retry-Scope header field
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-06.txt
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
Client-Cert Header draft
Potential Virtual Interim in May: action required
HTTP/2 and non-authoritative pushes
Re: Adoption of draft-richanna-http-message-signatures
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-00.txt