Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type)

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020, at 00:29, Tommy Pauly wrote:
> Regarding the done-ness and implementations, I agree that this 
> certainly isn’t as mature as QUIC. The key thing at this time is 
> getting the wire format stable enough to do the RR type early 
> allocation, 

I think that it is time to start this part.  Unless others agree with me regarding the size of the priority field, that is.

Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2020 23:08:15 UTC