- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:46:13 +1000
- To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
> On 14 Jun 2020, at 11:27 am, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > > In practice implementations (particularly older RFC2616 based ones) may > treat "no-cache" as if it were "no-store" and "must-revalidate" as if it > were unqualified "no-cache". That's not what I'm seeing in the tests: https://cache-tests.fyi/?id=cc-resp-no-cache-revalidate&id=cc-resp-no-cache-revalidate-fresh&id=cc-resp-must-revalidate-fresh# -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2020 06:46:34 UTC