- From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 05:09:24 -0700
- To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
- Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure@ietf.org, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>, tpauly@apple.com
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. The document is easy to read. And I loved the good old ASCII scissors "--8<--" Please find below a couple on non-blocking COMMENTs. I hope that this helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric == COMMENTS == -- Section 1 -- In the sentence "the mechanisms described herein are only intended to be used with those that explicitly opt into them.", does "those" mean "existing HTTP header" or "header", this little ambiguity should be lifted. -- Section 4.1.2 -- Wow, I am impressed that nowadays, even a dictionary is sent as an HTTP header. (just a plain comment of mine even if an example would be useful for me).
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2020 12:09:37 UTC