Re: Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT)

Thanks for reviewing, and apologies for the late reply.

I addressed your comments in
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1220

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:26 AM Erik Kline via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [[ nits ]]
>
> [ section 1 ]
> * "requires external device" -> "requires an external device"?
>
> [ section 2.2 ]
> * "indicate user agents" -> "indicate to user agents"?
>
> [ section 3.1 ]
> * s/sh-list/sf-list/g
>
> [ section 4.3 ]
> * "we can remove" -> perhaps another wording that doesn't require "we"
>
> * "unless the opt-in origin has explicitly delegated permission to another
>   origin": is this delegation mechanism documented somewhere that should
>   be referenced here?
>
> * "is challenging and likely" -> "may be challenging or even"
>
>
>
>