ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2020 by author

Alissa Cooper via Datatracker

• Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) (Monday, 18 May)

Amos Jeffries

• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-08.txt (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: Should the HTTP Method change when following a 303 redirect ? (Wednesday, 22 April)

Barry Leiba

• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Saturday, 6 June)
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 (Thursday, 7 May)

Barry Pollard

• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Monday, 15 June)

Ben Schwartz

• Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers (Saturday, 16 May)

Bence Béky

• Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization (Tuesday, 9 June)

Benjamin Kaduk

• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Monday, 18 May)

Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker

• Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-19: (with COMMENT) (Sunday, 7 June)
• Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Tuesday, 19 May)

Brian Campbell

• Re: something something certificate --- boiling a small lake (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Monday, 20 April)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Monday, 20 April)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Monday, 20 April)
• Client-Cert Header draft (Wednesday, 15 April)

Christer Holmberg

• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 (Friday, 1 May)

Daniel Veditz

• Re: Cookie-related status updates. (Tuesday, 26 May)

David Benjamin

• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Tuesday, 21 April)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Friday, 17 April)

David Schinazi

• Re: HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 (Tuesday, 5 May)
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 (Tuesday, 5 May)

Dmitri Tikhonov

• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Tuesday, 9 June)

Eric J Bowman

• Re: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl (Thursday, 14 May)

Eric Kinnear

• Re: HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization (Tuesday, 9 June)

Eric Rescorla

• Re: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: CDN versus edge compute use case distinction (was: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl (Thursday, 14 May)
• Re: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl (Thursday, 14 May)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Friday, 17 April)

Erik Kline via Datatracker

• Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) (Monday, 18 May)

Erik Nygren

• nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) (Thursday, 18 June)

Evert Pot

• Re: Adoption of Prefer-Push as an experimental submission (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Adoption of Prefer-Push as an experimental submission (Wednesday, 6 May)

Felipe Gasper

• Re: zstd PMCE for WebSocket (Thursday, 23 April)
• zstd PMCE for WebSocket (Wednesday, 22 April)

Graham Leggett

• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Tuesday, 21 April)

Ian Clelland

• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 (Monday, 11 May)

Ian Swett

• Re: HTTP Priority - proposal to support headers and frames (Tuesday, 5 May)

IETF Meeting Session Request Tool

• httpbis - Not having a session at IETF 108 (Thursday, 28 May)

internet-drafts@ietf.org

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-19.txt (Thursday, 4 June)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-08.txt (Tuesday, 26 May)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-08.txt (Tuesday, 26 May)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-08.txt (Tuesday, 26 May)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14.txt (Monday, 18 May)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-secondary-certs-06.txt (Thursday, 14 May)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13.txt (Friday, 24 April)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-06.txt (Monday, 20 April)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt (Monday, 20 April)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-00.txt (Friday, 10 April)

irakli

• Registration Request for the respond-for HTTP preference (Tuesday, 28 April)

James

• Re: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl (Thursday, 14 May)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Wednesday, 22 April)

James Peach

• Re: Generating a 421 status from a proxy (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Generating a 421 status from a proxy (Tuesday, 28 April)

Joe Orton

• RFC7616 uri= vs request-target etc (Thursday, 11 June)

Julian Reschke

• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers: Digests and Conditional Requests (Tuesday, 30 June)
• draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers: Digests and Conditional Requests (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: Structured request headers deployment issues (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-08.txt (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: empty lists, was: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• empty lists, was: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Boolean param notation, Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Monday, 18 May)
• empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Saturday, 16 May)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values (Tuesday, 12 May)
• draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-00.txt (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7232 (6080) (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8441 (5500) (Wednesday, 1 April)

Justin Richer

• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-00.txt (Wednesday, 15 April)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-00.txt (Tuesday, 14 April)

Kazuho Oku

• Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Tuesday, 19 May)

Ken Murchison

• Prefer: return=representation and caching (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-08.txt (Sunday, 14 June)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-08.txt (Saturday, 13 June)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-08.txt (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-08.txt (Thursday, 11 June)

Kent Watsen

• Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers (Monday, 11 May)
• Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers (Wednesday, 6 May)
• I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers (Tuesday, 5 May)

Kinuko Yasuda

• Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization (Wednesday, 10 June)

Loïc Hoguin

• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-06.txt (Monday, 20 April)

Lucas Pardue

• Re: HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Friday, 19 June)
• Fwd: Working Group Last Call: QUIC protocol drafts (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization (Friday, 5 June)
• Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization (Thursday, 4 June)
• Re: Adoption of Prefer-Push as an experimental submission (Wednesday, 6 May)
• HTTP Priority - proposal to support headers and frames (Monday, 4 May)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Monday, 20 April)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Monday, 20 April)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Friday, 17 April)

Magnus Westerlund

• Re: Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Thursday, 21 May)

Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker

• Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Wednesday, 20 May)

Mark Andrews

• Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) (Tuesday, 23 June)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-08.txt (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: Prefer: return=representation and caching (Tuesday, 23 June)
• HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: Structured request headers deployment issues (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: Structured request headers deployment issues (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Friday, 19 June)
• One last Structured Fields issue (Monday, 1 June)
• DRAFT minutes from the May 2020 Interim (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) (Friday, 22 May)
• Re: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Re: empty lists, was: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Reminder: 1st Virtual Interim session in ~11 hours (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Monday, 18 May)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 (Sunday, 10 May)
• Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers (Sunday, 10 May)
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 (Tuesday, 5 May)
• WG Virtual Meeting announcement: 2020-05-[19,26] (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: Generating a 421 status from a proxy (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: zstd PMCE for WebSocket (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: New I-D: Retry-Scope header field (Tuesday, 21 April)
• Potential Virtual Interim in May: action required (Wednesday, 15 April)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-00.txt (Wednesday, 15 April)

Martin Duke via Datatracker

• Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Sunday, 17 May)

Martin Thomson

• Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization (Tuesday, 9 June)

Matthew Kerwin

• Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Wednesday, 20 May)

Michael Toomim

• Re: Registration Request for the respond-for HTTP preference (Monday, 8 June)

Michiel Leenaars

• CDN versus edge compute use case distinction (was: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl) (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl (Thursday, 14 May)
• Re: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl (Thursday, 14 May)

Mike Bishop

• Updating HTTP/2 Extensions (Friday, 15 May)
• RE: Client-Cert Header draft (Friday, 17 April)
• HTTP/2 and non-authoritative pushes (Tuesday, 14 April)

Mike West

• Re: Structured request headers deployment issues (Monday, 22 June)
• Re: Structured request headers deployment issues (Friday, 19 June)
• Cookie-related status updates. (Tuesday, 26 May)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-06.txt (Monday, 20 April)

mohamed.boucadair@orange.com

• draft-btw-add-rfc8484-clarification: Review Request (Wednesday, 22 April)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker

• Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 21 May)

Murray S. Kucherawy

• Re: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Monday, 11 May)

Nico Williams

• Re: [TLS] something something certificate --- boiling a small lake (Saturday, 27 June)
• Re: [TLS] something something certificate --- boiling a small lake (Friday, 26 June)
• Re: [TLS] something something certificate --- boiling a small lake (Thursday, 25 June)

Olivier Boel EXT

• 100 Continue clarification (Thursday, 9 April)

Patrick Meenan

• Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization (Saturday, 20 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization (Friday, 5 June)

Paul Vixie

• Re: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl (Thursday, 14 May)

Piers O'Hanlon

• Re: New I-D: The Transport-Info HTTP Header-01 (Wednesday, 22 April)

Pof Magicfingers (Giovanni Olivera)

• Re: Should the HTTP Method change when following a 303 redirect ? (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Should the HTTP Method change when following a 303 redirect ? (Wednesday, 22 April)

Poul-Henning Kamp

• Re: Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Re: Boolean param notation, Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Tuesday, 19 May)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Saturday, 16 May)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 (Tuesday, 5 May)

Repository Activity Summary Bot

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 28 June)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 21 June)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 14 June)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 7 June)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 31 May)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 24 May)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 17 May)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 10 May)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 3 May)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 26 April)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 19 April)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 12 April)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 5 April)

RFC Errata System

• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (6149) (Wednesday, 29 April)
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7232 (6080) (Wednesday, 8 April)
• [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8441 (5500) (Wednesday, 1 April)

Richard Backman, Annabelle

• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-00.txt (Tuesday, 14 April)

Rick van Rein

• Re: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl (Wednesday, 6 May)

Robert Wilton via Datatracker

• Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 21 May)
• Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 20 May)

Roberto Polli

• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers: Digests and Conditional Requests (Tuesday, 30 June)
• Re: New I-D: Retry-Scope header field (Wednesday, 27 May)
• Digest wrap up: validators, algorithm parameters and buggy compression (Tuesday, 26 May)
• HTTP signature standardization attempt in the banking sector. (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Tuesday, 21 April)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-00.txt (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: Adoption of draft-richanna-http-message-signatures (Tuesday, 14 April)

Robin MARX

• Re: Adoption of Prefer-Push as an experimental submission (Wednesday, 13 May)

Roman Danyliw via Datatracker

• Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Wednesday, 20 May)
• Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Tuesday, 19 May)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (6149) (Wednesday, 29 April)

Soni L.

• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Tuesday, 21 April)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Monday, 20 April)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Monday, 20 April)
• Re: Client-Cert Header draft (Friday, 17 April)

Stefan Eissing

• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Monday, 15 June)

Stephen Farrell

• Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) (Tuesday, 23 June)

Ted Hardie

• Re: HTTP/2 and non-authoritative pushes (Tuesday, 14 April)

Tom Bergan

• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: HTTP/2 and non-authoritative pushes (Tuesday, 14 April)

Tommy Pauly

• Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl (Tuesday, 5 May)

W. Felix Handte

• Re: zstd PMCE for WebSocket (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: zstd PMCE for WebSocket (Thursday, 23 April)

Willy Tarreau

• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Saturday, 16 May)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Saturday, 16 May)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard (Friday, 15 May)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values (Wednesday, 13 May)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: 100 Continue clarification (Friday, 10 April)

Yoav Weiss

• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Structured request headers deployment issues (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Structured request headers deployment issues (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: Structured request headers deployment issues (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Structured request headers deployment issues (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Monday, 15 June)
• Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Tuesday, 12 May)
• Re: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) (Monday, 11 May)
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 (Friday, 8 May)
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 (Thursday, 7 May)
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 (Wednesday, 6 May)
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 (Tuesday, 5 May)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker

• Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) (Wednesday, 20 May)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 June 2020 16:31:52 UTC