- From: Ken Murchison <murch@fastmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:43:34 -0400
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 6/11/20 11:15 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 11.06.2020 15:06, Ken Murchison wrote: >> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics/ >> >> (...) >> >> I gave this a re-read this morning and noticed that status code 308 is >> missing from the list in paragraph 2 of Section 9.1 >> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-08#section-9.1>: >> >> >> Responses with status codes that are defined as heuristically >> cacheable (e.g., 200, 203, 204, 206, 300, 301, 404, 405, 410, 414, >> and 501 in this specification) >> >> Obviously, the list doesn't have to be exhaustive, but every other >> heuristically cacheable code in the spec (other than the recently added >> 308) is listed. > > Good catch. > > Could you please open a ticket over at > <https://github.com/httpwg/http-core>? https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/385 (which you already self-assigned) -- Kenneth Murchison Senior Software Developer Fastmail US LLC
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2020 17:43:51 UTC