- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 06:31:51 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, mnot@mnot.net, phk@varnish-cache.org, last-call@ietf.org, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, barryleiba@gmail.com, draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure@ietf.org
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 05:39:32AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: > I have no idea what the exact proposal would be. Fail when multiple > instances are there? That would be really annoying, because the main reason multiple headers happen is that most of these are inconditionally added by components which do not search for them. Look at the famous x-forwarded-for as an example! I'd say that multiple headers are the most natural way to produce an ordered list, and one which will continue to exist. Willy
Received on Saturday, 16 May 2020 04:32:24 UTC