- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 11:47:53 +1000
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: gen-art <gen-art@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, last-call@ietf.org
Perhaps not, but a larger int would do the trick. That said, I'm not sure this is worth the late change. Cheers, > On 7 May 2020, at 4:47 pm, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > > -------- > In message <977F061C-A4BB-413B-B26C-51C7A694FA74@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham writes: > >> Perhaps in full context: >> >> ~~~ >> For example: >> >> Example-ScaledInt: 4503; suffix=3DM >> >> Could be used to indicate a scaled value; in this case, 4,503,000,000, = >> if the `M` suffix parameter is specified to denote multiplying the = >> integer by 1,000,000. >> ~~~ >> >> Thoughts? > > Would people connect that to the 15 digit limitation ? > > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Sunday, 10 May 2020 01:48:10 UTC