www-rdf-interest@w3.org from January 2002 by author

Aaron Swartz

• Re: RDFCore update (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: Patent threat over RDF? (Wednesday, 2 January)

Alberto Reggiori

• Re: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? (Thursday, 31 January)

Alexaki Sofia

• extend rdfs:Class & rdf:Property (Thursday, 10 January)

Andrei S. Lopatenko

• Re: Take 2: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: belongsTo (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: belongsTo (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: belongsTo (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: belongsTo (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: Graph data anyone? (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Graph data anyone? (Wednesday, 9 January)

Arjohn Kampman

• Re: extend rdfs:Class & rdf:Property (Friday, 11 January)

Arthur Barstow

• Re: Common RDF parser bug? (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Common RDF parser bug? (Saturday, 19 January)

asun Gomez-perez

• ISWC: Call for tutorials (Wednesday, 9 January)

Barstow Art (NMP/Boston)

• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion (Monday, 14 January)

benhood@gmx.net

• belongsTo (Friday, 18 January)

Brian McBride

• Re: RDF API... Alive? (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Fwd: An RDF Schema for P3P published! (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Common RDF parser bug? (Tuesday, 22 January)
• RDFCore update (Monday, 14 January)

by way of

• Re: Common RDF parser bug? (Monday, 28 January)
• AGENTS for BUSINESS AUTOMATION (Friday, 11 January)
• EKAW 02: Extension of WS and tutorial deadline (Thursday, 10 January)
• Announcement: Workshop on E-Services and the Semantic Web (ESSW2002) (Thursday, 10 January)

Charles F. Munat

• Re: Long desc techniques - what is the url pointing to? (Tuesday, 29 January)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: name that URI was: Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: robots.rdf (Wednesday, 9 January)

Chris Croome

• Re: robots.rdf (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: robots.rdf (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: robots.rdf (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Alertbox: Site map usability (fwd) (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: robots.rdf (Tuesday, 8 January)

Chris Mungall

• Re: belongsTo (Monday, 21 January)

Dan Brickley

• AAAI'02 Workshop on Meaning Negotiation (fwd) (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: robots.rdf (Wednesday, 9 January)
• RDF patent discussions (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Alertbox: Site map usability (fwd) (Monday, 7 January)
• XML Europe 2002: still time to submit an abstract... (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Patent threat over RDF? (Wednesday, 2 January)

Dan Connolly

• how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? (Wednesday, 30 January)

Danny Ayers

• RE: Anonymous predicate (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Book with annotations chapter (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: [Fwd: Ontology mapping] Re: model-model mapping (Saturday, 19 January)
• RE: Graph data anyone? (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: Graph data anyone? (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: Graph data anyone? (Friday, 11 January)
• ANN: RDF to SVG tool (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: robots.rdf (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Graph data anyone? (Tuesday, 8 January)
• robots.rdf (Monday, 7 January)

Dave Beckett

• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Common RDF parser bug? (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion (Monday, 14 January)

Dave Reynolds

• Re: Common RDF parser bug? (Tuesday, 22 January)

David Allsopp

• Re: Common RDF parser bug? (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: RDFCore Update (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Common RDF parser bug? (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Common RDF parser bug? (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: Common RDF parser bug? (Monday, 21 January)

dehora

• RE: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: Alertbox: Site map usability (fwd) (Tuesday, 8 January)

Edd Dumbill

• Re: XML Europe 2002: still time to submit an abstract... (Friday, 4 January)

Enrico Silterra

• Re: RDFCore update (Friday, 18 January)

Frank Manola

• Re: Patent threat over RDF? (Wednesday, 2 January)

Frank van Harmelen

• Re: extend rdfs:Class & rdf:Property (Friday, 11 January)

Geoff Chappell

• Re: Take 2: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? (Wednesday, 30 January)

Graham Klyne

• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: RDF specifications (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) (Thursday, 3 January)
• RE: RDF specifications (Thursday, 3 January)

gt77@gmx.at

• RDF query language (Thursday, 31 January)

Henry S. Thompson

• Too simple, but maybe useful (Friday, 11 January)

HP for-Mailing-Lists

• "AGENTS for BUSINESS AUTOMATION" (Wednesday, 30 January)

Hutchison, Nigel

• Snowflake schemas and RDF? (Friday, 11 January)

Ian Horrocks

• ISWC 2002 2nd and Final Call for Papers (Friday, 11 January)

Janne Saarela

• Profium SIR extractor demonstration (Wednesday, 30 January)

Jeen Broekstra

• Re: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? (Thursday, 31 January)

Jeff Barr

• Re: Patent threat over RDF? (Friday, 4 January)

Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI

• SV: what RDF is not (was Re: RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) W3C Working Draft published) (Wednesday, 2 January)

Jeremy Carroll

• RE: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents (Friday, 25 January)
• RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: Question about ARP warning messages (Monday, 21 January)
• RE: Common RDF parser bug? (Monday, 21 January)
• RE: Common RDF parser bug? (Monday, 21 January)
• RE: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: what RDF is not (was Re: RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) W3C Working Draft published) (Sunday, 23 December)

Joachim.Peer@unisg.ch

• Re: semantic annotation of XML docs (Thursday, 10 January)

Jonathan Borden

• Re: name that URI was: Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents (Thursday, 31 January)
• XML Schema formal mapping of QNames to URIs (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents (Tuesday, 29 January)
• name that URI #2 (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: name that URI was: Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents (Tuesday, 29 January)
• name that URI was: Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents (Sunday, 27 January)
• Re: Expressing "not" in RDF rules (Sunday, 27 January)
• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: aboutEachPrefix? was Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs (Saturday, 5 January)
• Re: aboutEachPrefix? was Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Patent threat over RDF? (Wednesday, 2 January)
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) (Wednesday, 2 January)

jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

• Re: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? (Thursday, 31 January)

Judson, Ross

• RE: Patent threat over RDF? (Thursday, 3 January)

Leo Obrst

• [Fwd: Ontology mapping] Re: model-model mapping (Friday, 18 January)
• [Fwd: Ontology mapping] Re: model-model mapping (Friday, 18 January)
• [Fwd: Ontology mapping] Re: model-model mapping (Friday, 18 January)

Leonid Ototsky

• Re[2]: belongsTo (Tuesday, 22 January)

Libby Miller

• Re: RDF query language (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? (Thursday, 31 January)

Manos Batsis

• RE: XML Schema formal mapping of QNames to URIs (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: extend rdfs:Class & rdf:Property (Friday, 11 January)
• RE: robots.rdf (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)

Mark Baker

• Re: Identifying reals (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Identifying reals (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• Identifying reals (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Patent threat over RDF? (Wednesday, 2 January)

Mark Birbeck

• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: robots.rdf (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: aboutEachPrefix? was Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs (Saturday, 5 January)
• Re: aboutEachPrefix? was Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs (Saturday, 5 January)

Martin Frank

• CFP: WWW-2002 Semantic Web Workshop (Monday, 7 January)

Massimo Marchiori

• RE: robots.rdf (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: robots.rdf (Wednesday, 9 January)

Miles Sabin

• RE: Identifying reals (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)

Miloslav Nic

• Graphotron and RDF (Friday, 11 January)

MParmelee

• Fw: Question about ARP warning messages (Monday, 21 January)

Norman Walsh

• Re: name that URI was: Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Expressing "not" in RDF rules (Wednesday, 23 January)

oliver fodor

• semantic annotation of XML docs (Thursday, 10 January)

Ora Lassila

• Re: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? (Thursday, 31 January)

Patrick Durusau

• Re: Patent threat over RDF? (Wednesday, 2 January)

Patrick Stickler

• Take 2: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: name that URI was: Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: name that URI was: Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: RDFCore update (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Some recent Internet Drafts relating to RDF/KR/SW/etc. (Wednesday, 16 January)

Peter Crowther

• RE: Patent threat over RDF? (Wednesday, 2 January)
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) (Wednesday, 2 January)
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) (Wednesday, 2 January)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: Identifying reals (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Identifying reals (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: RDF specifications (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) (Wednesday, 2 January)

Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN

• Anonymous predicate (Monday, 28 January)

Ralph R. Swick

• Don't succumb to FUD Re: Patent threat over RDF? (Wednesday, 2 January)

Roland Schwaenzl

• Re: Common RDF parser bug? (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: Common RDF parser bug? (Monday, 21 January)

Roman Elizarov

• RDF API... Alive? (Tuesday, 29 January)

Ron Daniel

• RE: extend rdfs:Class & rdf:Property (Thursday, 10 January)

Said Tabet

• CALL FOR PAPERS and PARTICIPATION: Business Agents and the Semant ic Web (BASeWEB) (Friday, 25 January)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: Anonymous predicate (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Common RDF parser bug? (Sunday, 20 January)
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) (Wednesday, 2 January)
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) (Wednesday, 2 January)

Seaborne, Andy

• RE: Take 2: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? (Thursday, 31 January)
• ANN: Jena 1.3.0 released with persistent storage in relational da tabases (Tuesday, 15 January)

Sean B. Palmer

• Re: Anonymous predicate (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Expressing "not" in RDF rules (Sunday, 27 January)
• Re: Patent threat over RDF? (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Patent threat over RDF? (Wednesday, 2 January)

Seth Russell

• Re: Patent threat over RDF? (Wednesday, 2 January)

Shahan perera

• Encoding metadata for distributed resources using rdf (Thursday, 10 January)

Shelley Powers

• RE: Patent threat over RDF? (Friday, 4 January)
• RE: Patent threat over RDF? (Wednesday, 2 January)

Thomas B. Passin

• Re: Common RDF parser bug? (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Common RDF parser bug? (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Common RDF parser bug? (Saturday, 26 January)
• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Graph data anyone? (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Graph data anyone? (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: robots.rdf (Thursday, 10 January)

Tim Chartrand

• Research Topic -- Data Extraction and RDF (Wednesday, 30 January)

Uche Ogbuji

• Introduction to DAML: Part I, by Ouellet and Ogbuji (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Detailed introduction to Versa (Sunday, 20 January)
• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion (Thursday, 10 January)
• From the tragicomic to the merely comic (WRT RDF & Patents) (Saturday, 5 January)
• Re: Don't succumb to FUD Re: Patent threat over RDF? (Wednesday, 2 January)
• Re: Patent threat over RDF? (Tuesday, 1 January)
• Re: Patent threat over RDF? (Tuesday, 1 January)
• Patent threat over RDF? (Wednesday, 2 January)

Will Sargent

• RE: Expressing "not" in RDF rules (Saturday, 26 January)

Wolf Siberski

• AW: extend rdfs:Class & rdf:Property (Friday, 11 January)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2002 12:00:33 UTC