- From: Manos Batsis <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:17:06 +0200
- To: "Chris Croome" <chris@webarchitects.co.uk>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <www-html-editor@w3.org>, <www-html@w3.org>
<OriginalMessage From="Chris Croome [mailto:chris@webarchitects.co.uk]">
Since it's not too late how about someone in the W3C writing a Note
about the use of link="rel"? These are some of the things I'd like to do
with it:
rel="meta" -- RDF metadata for the current document
rel="meta sitemap" -- RDF or RSS file pointing to all meta
data files on the site
rel="sitemap" -- XHTML sitemap
rel="syndication" -- RSS 1.0 headlines
rel="alternate syndication" -- RSS 0.91 headlines
Also Mozilla is now using rel="first", rel="last", rel="parent",
rel="top", rel="icon", P3P has rel="P3Pv1", IE uses rel="shortcut icon",
none of which are in HTML 4.
</OriginalMessage>
Yup, even XHTML m12n in XML Schema defines the rel link attr as
(whitespace?) list of NMTOKENs (and not as a sequence of enumerations as
I expected, I guess I should have done my homework):
[...]
<xs:attribute name="rel" type="LinkTypes"/>
[...]
<!-- space-separated list of link types -->
<xs:simpleType name="LinkTypes">
<xs:list itemType="xs:NMTOKEN"/>
</xs:simpleType>
Kindest regards,
Manos
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2002 08:14:31 UTC