Patrick Sticker wrote: .. > > However, one final comment, I think that it is possible to work > with XML Schema datatype URIs with the present RDF/XML serialization > without recourse to qnames. We do, however, tend to use qnames > in examples for discussion as a convenience, but could also use > only URIs. perhaps an example makes my point: let's start with the following XML Schema which has the baseURI=http://example.com/XSD.xsd <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema xsd:targetNamespace=http://example.org/foo-schema-ns xmlns:ns=http://example.org/foo-schema-ns > <xsd:complexType name="bongo" id="foo"> ... </xsd:complexType> </xsd:schema> now the question: what is the URI of the complex type identified by the QName "ns:bongo" ? Hint: according to http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema it is NOT http://example.org/foo-schema-nsbongo > > The only question remaining, then, is what are the official URIs > for pre-defined XML Schema simple datatypes? see http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema JonathanReceived on Monday, 28 January 2002 20:14:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:52 GMT