www-tag@w3.org from March 2013 by date

Sunday, 31 March 2013

• Re: ACTION-714, ACTION -716 and ACTION-762: Privacy by Design Noah Mendelsohn
• ACTION-714, ACTION -716 and ACTION-762: Privacy by Design Ashok Malhotra

Friday, 29 March 2013

• Re: media types as anti-pattern Kingsley Idehen

Wednesday, 27 March 2013

• Re: Meaningless: towards a real-world web semantics observatory Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: Meaningless: towards a real-world web semantics observatory Alex Russell
• Re: Meaningless: towards a real-world web semantics observatory Alex Russell
• Re: Meaningless: towards a real-world web semantics observatory Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: Meaningless: towards a real-world web semantics observatory Christian Bizer
• Re: Meaningless: towards a real-world web semantics observatory Alex Russell
• Re: Meaningless: towards a real-world web semantics observatory Noah Mendelsohn
• Meaningless: towards a real-world web semantics observatory Alex Russell
• Partial draft minutes for TAG F2F of 18-20 March 2012 - awaiting logs for the rest Noah Mendelsohn

Tuesday, 26 March 2013

• Re: Atom vs Polyglot Karl Dubost
• There will be no TAG teleconference this week (28 March 2013) Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: Polyglot: the final thread? Eric J. Bowman
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Eric J. Bowman
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Eric J. Bowman
• Re: Atom vs Polyglot Eric J. Bowman
• Re: Atom vs Polyglot Eric J. Bowman
• Re: Atom vs Polyglot Eric J. Bowman
• Re: media types as anti-pattern (was: Why polyglot is needed) Eric J. Bowman

Monday, 25 March 2013

• Re: TAG Comment on [Web Storage] Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: TAG Comment on [Web Storage] Arthur Barstow
• Re: TAG Comment on [Web Storage] Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: TAG Comment on [Web Storage] Arthur Barstow

Friday, 22 March 2013

• Re: Atom vs Polyglot Julian Reschke
• Re: Atom vs Polyglot Edward O'Connor
• Re: Interesting critique of OAuth by one of its creators Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: Interesting critique of OAuth by one of its creators Melvin Carvalho
• Re: Interesting critique of OAuth by one of its creators Melvin Carvalho
• Re: Interesting critique of OAuth by one of its creators John Kemp
• Interesting critique of OAuth by one of its creators Noah Mendelsohn
• [Fwd: Stop the Dangerous Blogs Bill] Nathan Rixham
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Atom vs Polyglot Robin Berjon
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RE: Atom vs Polyglot Larry Masinter

Thursday, 21 March 2013

• Re: Atom vs Polyglot Julian Reschke
• Re: Atom vs Polyglot Robin Berjon
• Re: Atom vs Polyglot Noah Mendelsohn
• Atom vs Polyglot Julian Reschke

Wednesday, 20 March 2013

• Re: Why polyglot is needed Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Henri Sivonen
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Robin Berjon
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Henri Sivonen
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Robin Berjon
• Further to Noah's point about referencing and Polyglot Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Daniel Appelquist
• Re: URIs in data primer draft updated & httpRange-14 background David Booth
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Charles McCathie Nevile

Tuesday, 19 March 2013

• Re: Why polyglot is needed Michael[tm] Smith
• Re: Why polyglot is needed T.V Raman
• Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again? Jonas Sicking
• Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again? Alec Flett
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Michael[tm] Smith
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Michael[tm] Smith
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Henry S. Thompson
• Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Harry Halpin
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Michael[tm] Smith
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Michael[tm] Smith
• TAG F2F Agenda Updated Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: Why polyglot is needed Henry S. Thompson
• Why polyglot is needed Henry S. Thompson
• Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again? Alec Flett

Monday, 18 March 2013

• Fwd: Working Group Last Call on the HTTPbis document set Jonathan A Rees
• Re: Polyglot: the final thread? Charles McCathie Nevile

Sunday, 17 March 2013

• Re: Polyglot: the final thread? Graham Klyne
• Re: Polyglot: the final thread? Larry Masinter
• Updates to TAG F2F agenda Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: Polyglot: the final thread? Noah Mendelsohn
• RE: Polyglot: the final thread? Larry Masinter

Saturday, 16 March 2013

• Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again? Jonas Sicking
• Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again? Jonas Sicking

Thursday, 14 March 2013

• TAG F2F agenda nearly complete - TAG members encouraged to review Noah Mendelsohn

Wednesday, 13 March 2013

• Re: request for TAG F2F teleconference, 18-20 March 2013 Joe Nicholas
• Re: Polyglot: the final thread? Sam Ruby
• Re: Polyglot: the final thread? Alex Russell
• Re: Polyglot: the final thread? Marcos Caceres
• Re: Polyglot: the final thread? Robin Berjon
• Re: Polyglot: the final thread? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Polyglot: the final thread? Robin Berjon
• Re: Polyglot: the final thread? Alex Russell
• Re: Polyglot: the final thread? Alex Russell
• Re: Polyglot: the final thread? Larry Masinter
• Re: Polyglot: the final thread? Larry Masinter

Tuesday, 12 March 2013

• Polyglot: the final thread? Alex Russell
• TAG F2F agenda starting to take shape Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: URIs in data primer draft updated & httpRange-14 background Jeni Tennison
• Update on TAG F2F Agenda Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: There will be no TAG teleconference this week Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: There will be no TAG teleconference this week Alex Russell
• There will be no TAG teleconference this week Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: ACTION-754: F2F discussion of fragids work Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: ACTION-754: F2F discussion of fragids work Jeni Tennison

Monday, 11 March 2013

• Re: future of "publishing and linking" Ashok Malhotra
• Re: ACTION-786: Marcos to frame TAG F2F discussion of Javascript APIs Marcos Caceres
• Re: future of "publishing and linking" Noah Mendelsohn
• future of "publishing and linking" Larry Masinter
• Re: ACTION-786: Marcos to frame TAG F2F discussion of Javascript APIs Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: ACTION-782: Polyglot discussion at upcoming TAG F2F Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: ACTION-786: Marcos to frame TAG F2F discussion of Javascript APIs Marcos Caceres

Sunday, 10 March 2013

• Re: ACTION-782: Polyglot discussion at upcoming TAG F2F Yehuda Katz
• Re: URIs in data primer draft updated & httpRange-14 background Melvin Carvalho
• Re: ACTION-782: Polyglot discussion at upcoming TAG F2F Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: ACTION-788: F2F discussion of TAG liaison with ECMA TC39 Yehuda Katz
• ACTION-788: F2F discussion of TAG liaison with ECMA TC39 Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: ACTION-782: Polyglot discussion at upcoming TAG F2F Yehuda Katz
• ACTION-786: Marcos to frame TAG F2F discussion of Javascript APIs Noah Mendelsohn
• ACTION-782: Polyglot discussion at upcoming TAG F2F Noah Mendelsohn
• RE: URIs in data primer draft updated & httpRange-14 background Markus Lanthaler
• Re: URIs in data primer draft updated & httpRange-14 background Henry S. Thompson
• Re: ACTION-784: F2F discussion of layering Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: ACTION-784: F2F discussion of layering Yehuda Katz
• Re: URIs in data primer draft updated & httpRange-14 background Noah Mendelsohn
• ACTION-784: F2F discussion of layering Noah Mendelsohn
• ACTION-754: F2F discussion of fragids work Noah Mendelsohn

Thursday, 7 March 2013

• Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? Non-reactable. rektide

Friday, 8 March 2013

• Re: URIs in data primer draft updated & httpRange-14 background Markus Lanthaler

Thursday, 7 March 2013

• URIs in data primer draft updated & httpRange-14 background Jeni Tennison
• Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again? piranna@gmail.com
• Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again? Shwetank Dixit
• Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again? Alex Russell
• Re: Requesting your contribution to TAG retrospective sessions at F2F Henry S. Thompson

Wednesday, 6 March 2013

• XML and JSON Ashok Malhotra
• Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again? Alec Flett
• Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again? イアンフェッティ
• Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again? Alec Flett
• Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again? Dale Harvey
• IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again? Alex Russell

Tuesday, 5 March 2013

• Re: Requesting your contribution to TAG retrospective sessions at F2F Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: Requesting your contribution to TAG retrospective sessions at F2F Ashok Malhotra
• Re: Requesting your contribution to TAG retrospective sessions at F2F Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: Requesting your contribution to TAG retrospective sessions at F2F Ashok Malhotra

Monday, 4 March 2013

• RE: Revisiting Authoritative Metadata Larry Masinter
• Re: Revisiting Authoritative Metadata (was: The failure of Appendix C as a transition technique) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Revisiting Authoritative Metadata (was: The failure of Appendix C as a transition technique) Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: Revisiting Authoritative Metadata (was: The failure of Appendix C as a transition technique) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Revisiting Authoritative Metadata (was: The failure of Appendix C as a transition technique) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Revisiting Authoritative Metadata (was: The failure of Appendix C as a transition technique) Anne van Kesteren
• RE: Revisiting Authoritative Metadata (was: The failure of Appendix C as a transition technique) Larry Masinter
• Re: Revisiting Authoritative Metadata (was: The failure of Appendix C as a transition technique) Bjoern Hoehrmann

Sunday, 3 March 2013

• Re: Revisiting Authoritative Metadata (was: The failure of Appendix C as a transition technique) Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: Revisiting Authoritative Metadata Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Revisiting Authoritative Metadata (was: The failure of Appendix C as a transition technique) Bjoern Hoehrmann

Saturday, 2 March 2013

• Re: Requesting your contribution to TAG retrospective sessions at F2F Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: Requesting your contribution to TAG retrospective sessions at F2F Jeni Tennison
• Re: Revisiting Authoritative Metadata (was: The failure of Appendix C as a transition technique) Mukul Gandhi
• Re: Revisiting Authoritative Metadata (was: The failure of Appendix C as a transition technique) David Sheets

Friday, 1 March 2013

• Re: Privacy by Design Noah Mendelsohn
• Privacy by Design Ashok Malhotra
• Re: Revisiting Authoritative Metadata (was: The failure of Appendix C as a transition technique) Robin Berjon
• Re: Revisiting Authoritative Metadata (was: The failure of Appendix C as a transition technique) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RE: Revisiting Authoritative Metadata Larry Masinter

Last message date: Sunday, 31 March 2013 16:41:56 UTC