- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:26:48 -0400
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
OK, thank you. I don't propose to pursue this further unless TAG members ask me to, but it's very helpful to have this clarification on the record. Thank you! Noah On 3/25/2013 9:15 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 3/25/13 9:07 AM, ext Noah Mendelsohn wrote: >> ---------------- >> The TAG believes it is important to consider more carefully the potential >> advantages of providing a single facility to cover the use cases, of >> perhaps modularizing the architecture so that some parts are shared, or if >> separate facilities are indeed the best design, providing common data >> access and manipulation APIs. If further careful analysis suggests that no >> such integration is practical, then, at a minimum, each specification >> should discuss how it is positioned with respect to the other. >> ---------------- >> >> I am not entirely clear on what if anything the WebApps group decided to >> do about this request. Would you please briefly clarify? > > So I think the common view is that if Web Storage isn't the right tool, > then use Indexed Database (also relatively broadly implemented e.g. see > <http://caniuse.com/#feat=indexeddb>). > > -Thanks, AB > > >
Received on Monday, 25 March 2013 13:27:13 UTC