Re: TAG Comment on [Web Storage]

OK, thank you. I don't propose to pursue this further unless TAG members 
ask me to, but it's very helpful to have this clarification on the record. 
Thank you!


On 3/25/2013 9:15 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> On 3/25/13 9:07 AM, ext Noah Mendelsohn wrote:
>> ----------------
>> The TAG believes it is important to consider more carefully the potential
>> advantages of providing a single facility to cover the use cases, of
>> perhaps modularizing the architecture so that some parts are shared, or if
>> separate facilities are indeed the best design, providing common data
>> access and manipulation APIs. If further careful analysis suggests that no
>> such integration is practical, then, at a minimum, each specification
>> should discuss how it is positioned with respect to the other.
>> ----------------
>> I am not entirely clear on what if anything the WebApps group decided to
>> do about this request. Would you please briefly clarify?
> So I think the common view is that if Web Storage isn't the right tool,
> then use Indexed Database (also relatively broadly implemented e.g. see
> <>).
> -Thanks, AB

Received on Monday, 25 March 2013 13:27:13 UTC