- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:39:31 +0100
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- CC: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, www-tag@w3.org
On 20/03/2013 14:25 , Henry S. Thompson wrote: > As long as a constituency exists of which I'm representative, > documenting Polyglot provides a genuine service. I guess I'm a little bit confused as to how you are saying that it would help. Are you saying that if Polyglot had been better documented you would not have produced invalid content as you did? How would that have helped compared to, say, the validator (or other documentation on producing conforming HTML)? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2013 13:39:49 UTC