W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Why polyglot is needed

From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:39:31 +0100
Message-ID: <5149BC13.2020101@w3.org>
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
CC: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, www-tag@w3.org
On 20/03/2013 14:25 , Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> As long as a constituency exists of which I'm representative,
> documenting Polyglot provides a genuine service.

I guess I'm a little bit confused as to how you are saying that it would 

Are you saying that if Polyglot had been better documented you would not 
have produced invalid content as you did? How would that have helped 
compared to, say, the validator (or other documentation on producing 
conforming HTML)?

Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2013 13:39:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:54 UTC