- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:08:38 +0100
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- CC: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
On 13/03/2013 03:14 , Larry Masinter wrote: > I think polyglot is a general important technique for transitioning > languages, interfaces and protocols, and the TAG could do most good by > understanding and explaining it. There is no doubt that there are useful techniques for language evolution, and that mutually intelligible subsets is an important tool for language evolution in a massively distributed system, where version indicators cannot hope to work. But that's a general discussion on versioning (for which I believe the TAG still has an open issue…). It has little to do with how the HTML WG should pursue polyglot. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2013 11:08:50 UTC