Re: Requesting your contribution to TAG retrospective sessions at F2F

Did you want to review the Identifying Application State finding?   I'm not sure we have new news.
All the best, Ashok
On 3/4/2013 7:35 PM, Noah Mendelsohn wrote:
> On 3/4/2013 7:04 PM, Ashok Malhotra wrote:
>> - What should we do with the Publishing and Linking document: abandon,
>> revise, shape-shift
>> - Client-side storage, especially if Alex will be at the f2f
> Thank you. I'll put these on the list and see how prioritization goes. I am struck that most of the suggestions I've received so far relate to topics the TAG has dealt with in the last year or so. Not necessarily a bad thing, but I'm hoping we can also review some of the most important work of the TAG, and the most important positions we've taken on things going back much further. I think this is important for two reasons: 1) it underscores the scope of the TAG as it has traditionally seen itself and 2) we the current TAG are responsible for these positions. Implicitly, we support them unless we decide to reopen debate and change them.
> If you have any ideas for such earlier work that we should review, please let me know.
> Noah

Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2013 00:59:40 UTC