Re: future of "publishing and linking"

Thank you, Larry. At the very least, I will put this email on the required 
reading for the P&L discussion.

Noah

On 3/11/2013 10:14 AM, Larry Masinter wrote:
> My take on the future of P & L is that the feedback was substantial, including questioning the document's scope, audience, and utility.
> Addressing those and continuing to Recommendation will require some substantial work, and if the work is to continue in the TAG, it will require a substantial commitment.
>
> My suggestion is that the TAG should decide whether the TAG is going to take on relationship between "governance" and "architecture", as I outlined in
> http://masinter.blogspot.com/2012/12/governance-and-web-standards.html
>
> An alternative would be to publish the current document as a NOTE (perhaps uncommenting the "Best Practice" suggestions), and to invite the W3C to find some (non-TAG) activity to continue the work.
>
> Larry
> --
> http://larry.masinter.net
>
>

Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 14:54:11 UTC