- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:51:28 -0400
- To: Yehuda Katz <yehuda.katz@jquery.com>
- CC: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
On 3/10/2013 4:39 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote: > > My goal was just to get a face-to-face discussion about this so that > passionate supporters of using TAG time for this could make their case. I > believe that several of the new members do not see this as a good use of > TAG's limited time, but wanted to give longer-standing members an > opportunity to disabuse us of that. I'm fine with the spirit of this, though am wondering if the details are backward. The TAG has made a request to the HTML working group that the polyglot document move forward. If we spend no time on it, the TAG's position on that stands. My impression was that it was some or perhaps all of our "new members" who felt it might be worth time to reconsider the TAG's position, and I'm willing to schedule some time if so. What am I missing? Thank you. Noah
Received on Sunday, 10 March 2013 20:52:09 UTC