Re: Why polyglot is needed

On 20/03/2013 01:18, "Charles McCathie Nevile" <>

>[...] On the other hand, I still believe a polyglot document is useful.
>explained that it is useful for companies and organisations where english
>isn't a language routinely used by the people who have to do the relevant
>work, and where there are XML toolchains in use.
>I don't think this is an architectural issue and I don't think the TAG
>should be spending their time on it. It's a deployent issue, that falls in
>the scope of the HTML WG... [...]

For what it's worth: +1 to the above.  ("Yes" to a polyglot spec being
useful to some communities. "No" to a TAG work item on polyglot.)


Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2013 10:02:19 UTC