On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>wrote: > I have TAG ACTION: > > ACTION-782: on - Noah Mendelsohn - schedule F2F discussion of polyglot, > the TAG's request to HTML WG on polygot, and HTML/XML Unification - Due: > 2013-03-01 - OPEN > > We discussed this on 28 Feb [1] and earlier on 24 January [2]. From the 28 > Feb minutes: > > ------------------------------------------ > NM: I assumed people wanted to discuss having the TAG change it's > position. > > Minutes of discussion leading to ACTION: > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2013/01/24-minutes.html#item10 > > NM: The F2F discussion was requested on 24 January > ... by Yehuda > > YK: Yes, I think we need to get "old" and "new" TAG members in sync > > <ht> I have not had the time to assemble a satisfactory email on Polyglot, > but would like to participate in a f2f discussion > > <ht> yes please > > HT: Try to schedule polyglot when I can call > > <JeniT> I agree that there's probably a core disagreement here, and we > should try to get down to it > > <JeniT> slightlylate(*) has been researching it > > <JeniT> so perhaps he would be in a good position to do some prep > > *NM: OK, I'll take this offline, will check with Alex, Yehuda and Henry > among others * > ------------------------------------------ > > OK, I'm checking :-). Seriously, I will definitely schedule a session, and > I think I can assemble pointers to email threads, the TAG's position, etc. > Alex: as you see, there was speculation that you might want to contribute > to the preparation. If you have any references to include in the agenda or > required reading, please send them along. If you have position statements > you want considered, then please make sure they're linkable in the email > archives and I'll include them in the F2F prep list. Likewise for Yehuda, > Henry and others: please alert me to anything you want including in the > agenda item or issue framing. Thank you. > My goal was just to get a face-to-face discussion about this so that passionate supporters of using TAG time for this could make their case. I believe that several of the new members do not see this as a good use of TAG's limited time, but wanted to give longer-standing members an opportunity to disabuse us of that. > > Noah > > (*) slightlylate is Alex Russell > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2013/02/28-minutes#item03 > [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2013/01/24-minutes.html#item10 > > > -- Yehuda Katz (ph) 718.877.1325
Received on Sunday, 10 March 2013 20:40:00 UTC