- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:15:44 +0000
- To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Cc: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Monday, 11 March 2013 at 13:04, Noah Mendelsohn wrote: > OK, if that's your preference, it's probably best. Still: history suggests > that we do best if we come out of our F2F meetings with a small number > (3-5) of top priority projects on which we can really focus. This meeting > we come in with a relatively clean slate, and choosing the best topics is > one of the most important things we do. So, if this seems on the merits > like such a priority (I'm not sure), we should try to find away to jump > start it ASAP, before everyone gets assigned to other things. > > I'm neutral on the merits of this one, but my experience is that projects > mostly get formed at F2F meetings. With luck, we'll have another late May > or June, but I do want to get us focused on a good work plan ASAP. > Sure, lets see what comes out of the F2F. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 15:16:27 UTC