On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>wrote: > > On 3/10/2013 4:39 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote: > >> >> My goal was just to get a face-to-face discussion about this so that >> passionate supporters of using TAG time for this could make their case. I >> believe that several of the new members do not see this as a good use of >> TAG's limited time, but wanted to give longer-standing members an >> opportunity to disabuse us of that. >> > > I'm fine with the spirit of this, though am wondering if the details are > backward. The TAG has made a request to the HTML working group that the > polyglot document move forward. If we spend no time on it, the TAG's > position on that stands. My impression was that it was some or perhaps all > of our "new members" who felt it might be worth time to reconsider the > TAG's position, and I'm willing to schedule some time if so. What am I > missing? Thank you. I believe that Alex and I both expressed our suspicion that this particular discussion served as a reasonable proxy for other seeming disagreements, and we wanted to use a concrete point of controversy in order to raise the discussion. I believe that other members (maybe Jeni) agreed that it could be a useful way to have a much-needed discussion. > > > Noah > -- Yehuda Katz (ph) 718.877.1325
Received on Sunday, 10 March 2013 21:11:23 UTC