www-html@w3.org from June 2005 by date

Thursday, 30 June 2005

• Object content and rendering Karl Dubost

Wednesday, 29 June 2005

• [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements? Jim Jewett

Monday, 27 June 2005

• Re: Question about web spiders... Peter Kupfer

Sunday, 26 June 2005

• Re: Question about web spiders... David Woolley
• Re: Question about web spiders... Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Question about web spiders... Peter Kupfer
• Re: Question about web spiders... Peter Kupfer
• Re: Question about web spiders... Jasper Bryant-Greene
• Re: Question about web spiders... Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Question about web spiders... Jasper Bryant-Greene

Saturday, 25 June 2005

• Question about web spiders... Peter Kupfer
• FYI: application/xhtml-voice+xml Bjoern Hoehrmann

Friday, 24 June 2005

• Re: XML tags are just a cheap rip-off of PHP tags David Woolley
• Re: XML tags are just a cheap rip-off of PHP tags Devin Bayer
• Re: XML tags are just a cheap rip-off of PHP tags Jasper Bryant-Greene
• Re: XML tags are just a cheap rip-off of PHP tags Sebastian Redl
• Re: XML tags are just a cheap rip-off of PHP tags Laurens Holst
• Re: XML tags are just a cheap rip-off of PHP tags Jasper Bryant-Greene
• Re: XML tags are just a cheap rip-off of PHP tags Kelly Miller

Thursday, 23 June 2005

• Re: XML tags are just a cheap rip-off of PHP tags David Woolley
• RE: Submit method: DELETE? Klotz, Leigh
• Re: XML tags are just a cheap rip-off of PHP tags Laurens Holst
• Re: XML tags are just a cheap rip-off of PHP tags Jasper Bryant-Greene
• Re: XML tags are just a cheap rip-off of PHP tags Kelly Miller
• Re: XML tags are just a cheap rip-off of PHP tags Jasper Bryant-Greene
• Re: XML tags are just a cheap rip-off of PHP tags Kelly Miller
• Re: XML tags are just a cheap rip-off of PHP tags Jasper Bryant-Greene
• XML tags are just a cheap rip-off of PHP tags dagobah1@optonline.net

Wednesday, 22 June 2005

• Re: blockquote and quotation in XHTML 2.0 Karl Dubost

Tuesday, 21 June 2005

• Re: blockquote and quotation in XHTML 2.0 fantasai
• blockquote and quotation in XHTML 2.0 Karl Dubost

Monday, 20 June 2005

• Re: When is something a tag? David Woolley
• Re: Floating Tables within a cell-<table> tag enhancement David Woolley
• Re: Floating Tables within a cell-<table> tag enhancement David Dorward
• Re: Floating Tables within a cell-<table> tag enhancement Jalesh Dikshit
• Re: When is something a tag? David Håsäther
• Re: When is something a tag? Robert
• Submit method: DELETE? Steffen Goeldner
• Re: When is something a tag? David Håsäther
• Re: When is something a tag? Laurens Holst

Sunday, 19 June 2005

• When is something a tag? Robert
• Floating Tables within a cell Jalesh Dikshit

Saturday, 18 June 2005

• Re: Nested colgroups and rowgroups Jasper Bryant-Greene
• Re: Divs and frames... Joachim Ekstrand

Friday, 17 June 2005

• Nested colgroups and rowgroups Jim Jewett

Wednesday, 15 June 2005

• Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 document conformance requirements Herbert Schiemann

Monday, 13 June 2005

• Re: [XHTML2] exclude switch and case as presentational Shane McCarron
• Re: Divs and frames... Kelly Miller
• RE: [XHTML2] exclude switch and case as presentational John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: [XHTML2] exclude switch and case as presentational Orion Adrian
• Re: Divs and frames... David Dorward
• Divs and frames... Joachim Ekstrand
• Re: Text over image? Laurens Holst
• Re: Text over image? Laurens Holst
• RE: [XHTML2] exclude switch and case as presentational John Foliot - WATS.ca
• The many roles of HTML. Orion Adrian
• RE: [XHTML2] exclude switch and case as presentational Mark Birbeck
• Re: [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements? Sjoerd Visscher
• Re: [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements? David Woolley

Sunday, 12 June 2005

• Text over image? a monkey

Monday, 13 June 2005

• Re: [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements? Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements? Laurens Holst
• Re: [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements? Lachlan Hunt

Sunday, 12 June 2005

• Re: [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements? David Woolley

Saturday, 11 June 2005

• Re: [XHTML2] exclude switch and case as presentational ACJ
• Re: [XHTML2] exclude switch and case as presentational Laurens Holst
• Re: [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements? Laurens Holst
• Re: [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements? Laurens Holst
• Re: XHTML Modularization and Tables... Laurens Holst
• Re: [XHTML2] exclude switch and case as presentational Laurens Holst
• Re: [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements? Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements? David Woolley
• Re: [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements? Lachlan Hunt
• Re: N3 syntax in XHTML 2 [was RE: DC in XHTML2] Sjoerd Visscher
• Re: separator abuse Orion Adrian

Friday, 10 June 2005

• [XHTML2] exclude switch and case as presentational David Woolley
• [XHTML2] "case" missing from element index and hyperlinking David Woolley
• Re: XHTML Modularization and Tables... David Woolley
• Re: [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements? David Woolley
• Re: The IPTC's need for reification in XHTML 2 [was RE: DC in XHTML2] Al Gilman
• The IPTC's need for reification in XHTML 2 [was RE: DC in XHTML2] Mark Birbeck
• RE: N3 syntax in XHTML 2 [was RE: DC in XHTML2] Mark Birbeck
• Re: <tabgroup> and <tab> Steven Pemberton
• Re: [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements? Ian Hickson
• Re: [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements? Jim Ley
• Re: N3 syntax in XHTML 2 [was RE: DC in XHTML2] Sjoerd Visscher
• RE: N3 syntax in XHTML 2 [was RE: DC in XHTML2] Mark Birbeck
• Re: [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements? Ian Hickson
• Re: [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements? Jim Ley
• [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements? Ian Hickson

Thursday, 9 June 2005

• Re: separator abuse Christoph Päper
• Re: N3 syntax in XHTML 2 [was RE: DC in XHTML2] Jim Ley
• N3 syntax in XHTML 2 [was RE: DC in XHTML2] Mark Birbeck
• Re: DC in XHTML2 Sjoerd Visscher
• Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?) David Woolley
• Re: XHTML Modularization and Tables... David Woolley
• RE: DC in XHTML2 Al Gilman
• RE: DC in XHTML2 Mark Birbeck
• RE: DC in XHTML2 Dan Brickley
• Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?) Jason White
• RE: DC in XHTML2 Mark Birbeck
• RE: XHTML Modularization and Tables... Mark Birbeck
• Re: DC in XHTML2 Phil Archer
• Re: DC in XHTML2 Sjoerd Visscher

Saturday, 4 June 2005

• RE: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?) Richard Schwerdtfeger

Thursday, 9 June 2005

• Re: DC in XHTML2 Dan Brickley

Wednesday, 8 June 2005

• Re: XHTML Modularization and Tables... David Woolley
• Re: DC in XHTML2 Al Gilman
• Re: DC in XHTML2 Sjoerd Visscher
• (no subject) Dsr
• RE: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?) John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: DC in XHTML2 Orion Adrian
• Re: DC in XHTML2 Phil Archer
• Re: DC in XHTML2 Johannes Koch
• Re: DC in XHTML2 Laurens Holst
• Re: DC in XHTML2 Phil Archer
• Re: xhtml2 question: http-equiv Max Froumentin
• Re: separator abuse Orion Adrian

Tuesday, 7 June 2005

• Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0 Jim Jewett
• Re: separator abuse Christoph Päper
• RE: XHTML Modularization and Tables... Mark Birbeck
• RE: DC in XHTML2 Mark Birbeck
• RE: DC in XHTML2 Misha Wolf
• Re: Tabgroup and Tab Dustin
• Re: XHTML Modularization and Tables... David Woolley
• Re: Tabgroup and Tab David Woolley
• Re: XHTML Modularization and Tables... Laurens Holst
• Re: XHTML Modularization and Tables... Shane McCarron
• Re: XHTML Modularization and Tables... Laurens Holst
• Re: DC in XHTML2 Lisa Seeman
• Re: DC in XHTML2 Shane McCarron
• DC in XHTML2 Misha Wolf
• RE: XHTML Modularization and Tables... Mark Birbeck
• Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?) Shane McCarron
• Re: XHTML Modularization and Tables... Shane McCarron
• RE: XHTML Modularization and Tables... Boysko, Glenn
• RE: Comment - 25. XHTML Role Access Module John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: Comment - 25. XHTML Role Access Module Mikko Rantalainen
• RE: XHTML Modularization and Tables... Mark Birbeck
• Tabgroup and Tab David Dorward

Sunday, 5 June 2005

• <tabgroup> and <tab> elements Shankar

Tuesday, 31 May 2005

• XHTML Modularization and Tables... Boysko, Glenn

Monday, 6 June 2005

• RE: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?) John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?) David Woolley

Sunday, 5 June 2005

• Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?) Shane McCarron
• Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?) David Woolley
• Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?) Shane McCarron
• RE: Authors propose defaults RE: Access Element John Foliot - WATS.ca
• RE: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?) John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Authors propose defaults RE: Access Element charles@sidar.org
• Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?) Richard Schwerdtfeger
• RE: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?) John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Tracking comments about XHTML 2.0 on Weblogs Karl Dubost

Saturday, 4 June 2005

• Re: WD-xhtml2-20050527: img element not required Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: WD-xhtml2-20050527: img element not required Dave Hodder
• RE: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?) John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0 Orion Adrian
• Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0 David Woolley
• Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?) David Woolley
• Re: <separator /> should be <transition /> Anne van Kesteren
• Re: <separator /> should be <transition /> Laurens Holst
• Re: <separator /> should be <transition /> Anne van Kesteren

Friday, 3 June 2005

• Re: <separator /> should be <transition /> Laurens Holst
• Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0 Edward Lass
• Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0 Karl Dubost
• what sort of precedent? [was: Re: Access Element is WRONG ...] Al Gilman
• Re: xhtml2 question: http-equiv David Woolley
• Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0 Karl Dubost
• Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?) Micah Dubinko
• Re: <separator /> should be <transition /> Orion Adrian
• Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0 Orion Adrian
• Re: Access Element is WRONG (was RE: Are we really still talking about Access Keys?) Al Gilman
• Re: <separator /> should be <transition /> Orion Adrian
• Re: xhtml2 question: http-equiv Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0 Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: <separator /> should be <transition /> Anne van Kesteren

Thursday, 2 June 2005

• RE: <separator /> should be <transition /> Mark Birbeck

Friday, 3 June 2005

• Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0 Orion Adrian
• Re: Are we really still talking about Access Keys? Orion Adrian
• Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0 Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0 Orion Adrian
• xhtml2 question: http-equiv Max Froumentin
• Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0 Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0 Orion Adrian
• Re: <separator /> should be <transition /> Orion Adrian
• Invitation to join the Web Services Discussion Forum John Eliacy
• Re: Comment - 25. XHTML Role Access Module Laurens Holst

Thursday, 2 June 2005

• Re: <separator /> should be <transition /> Chiaki
• Comment - 25. XHTML Role Access Module John Foliot - WATS.ca

Friday, 3 June 2005

• Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0 Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: <separator /> should be <transition /> ACJ

Thursday, 2 June 2005

• Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0 Micah Dubinko
• Re: <separator /> should be <transition /> Christoph Päper
• (no subject) Dsr
• Re: ol, ul, nl, dl, oh my! (was Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element) David Woolley
• Re: Are we really still talking about Access Keys? Al Gilman
• Re: <separator /> should be <transition /> Dan Brickley
• Re: <separator /> should be <transition /> Shane McCarron
• Re: <separator /> should be <transition /> Micah Dubinko
• Re: Are we really still talking about Access Keys? Orion Adrian
• <separator /> should be <transition /> Orion Adrian
• Re: separator abuse Orion Adrian
• Re: Change XHTML 2.0 namespace to http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml Anne van Kesteren
• Change XHTML 2.0 namespace to http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml Laurens Holst
• Re: ol, ul, nl, dl, oh my! (was Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: ol, ul, nl, dl, oh my! (was Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element) Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: ol, ul, nl, dl, oh my! (was Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element) Ian Hickson
• Re: ol, ul, nl, dl, oh my! (was Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element) Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: ol, ul, nl, dl, oh my! (was Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element) Daniel Glazman

Wednesday, 1 June 2005

• Re: ol, ul, nl, dl, oh my! (was Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element) Shane McCarron
• Re: ol, ul, nl, dl, oh my! (was Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element) Edward Lass
• Re: ol, ul, nl, dl, oh my! (was Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element) Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: ol, ul, nl, dl, oh my! (was Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element) Shane McCarron
• Re: ol, ul, nl, dl, oh my! (was Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element) Daniel Glazman
• Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element Shane McCarron
• Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element Ian Hickson
• (no subject) Dsr
• ol, ul, nl, dl, oh my! (was Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element) Edward Lass
• Re: The relationship to RDF Steven Pemberton
• Re: [XHTML 2] 24.1 OBJECT declare and "completed loading" (PR#7751) Henri Sivonen
• Re: separator abuse Orion Adrian
• Re: separator abuse Johannes Koch
• Re: separator abuse Orion Adrian
• Re: [XHTML 2] 24.1 OBJECT declare and "completed loading" (PR#7751) Sebastian Redl
• Is that the right place for request of enhancement on XHTML 2.0? symbulos
• Re: separator abuse Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: [XHTML 2] 24.1 OBJECT declare and "completed loading" (PR#7751) Spartanicus
• Re: [XHTML 2] 24.1 OBJECT declare and "completed loading" (PR#7751) Jim Ley
• RE: [XHTML 2] 24.1 OBJECT declare and "completed loading" (PR#7751) Brad Pettit

Last message date: Thursday, 30 June 2005 14:34:09 UTC