RE: <separator /> should be <transition />

Micah/Orion,

I don't see the point in changing the name. The debate was about whether:

  (a) the whole world should be seen as a collection of hierarchical
      groups, or;

  (b) sometimes data needs to be separated by a 'separator'.

I think the argument for (a) has not been won, and I haven't seen anyone
from the (a) camp say, "we'll accept (b) if you change the name".

So I think things should just be left as they are.

Regards,

Mark



Mark Birbeck
CEO
x-port.net Ltd.

e: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net
t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/
b: http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/

Download our XForms processor from
http://www.formsPlayer.com/ 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-html-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Micah Dubinko
> Sent: 02 June 2005 18:11
> To: Orion Adrian; www-html@w3.org
> Subject: Re: <separator /> should be <transition />
> 
> 
> I could get behind this. -m
> 
> Orion Adrian wrote:
> 
> >Since this suggested name change happened very late into the 
> >conversation past many people's attention span would probably allow, 
> >I'm going to suggest it here.
> >
> >Let's rename <separator /> to <transition />. I think more 
> people could 
> >get behind it then.
> >
> >Orion Adrian
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> --
>   Available for consulting. XForms, web forms, information overload.
>   Micah Dubinko                           mailto:micah@dubinko.info
>   Brain Attic, L.L.C.                        http://brainattic.info
>   Yahoo IM: mdubinko                                +1 623 298 5172
>   Learn XForms today: http://xformsinstitute.com
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Friday, 3 June 2005 14:43:28 UTC