- From: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:01:22 -0400
- To: www-html@w3.org
Ok... fine... we'll just do: <transition>~~~</transition> and now it's structural. However it doesn't change the fact that <object> is content seeing as how it doesn't markup content but rather is content. Unless you think the fallback content is the content represented by the object element. Orion Adrian On 6/9/05, Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@tu-clausthal.de> wrote: > Orion Adrian: > > On 6/7/05, Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@tu-clausthal.de> wrote: > >> I was thinking about an audio book, which (sometimes) do have > >> background/ambient sounds. > > > > There are other organization methods that will be used and can be used. > > Different solutions for the same problem, dpending on media? I don't > think so. > > > There are quite a few things that don't follow standard technical > > writing organization. Authors often feel that they have the right to > > use structure as art. > > Something you don't have to encourage (or even take into account) in the > design of a general purpose mark-up language. > > > I'd rather not have to specify all my separators as > > <span class="separator">&separator;</span> > > just because you don't like empty elements. > > I'm for enclosing the blocks that are to be separated, not for any > simulation of 'hr' at all, but if /you/ wanted to make one, you > certainly shouldn't be using 'span'. > > > I do not agree with the assesment that separator is structural. > > Okay, then it doesn't need to be included into a structural mark-up > language. > > Christoph Päper >
Received on Saturday, 11 June 2005 00:01:25 UTC