- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 10:57:49 +0100 (BST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
> Images and sub-documents aren't content? This is news to me and is One of the consequences of Mosaic's addition of images was a weakening of the web concept. In a pure web concept, img elements are really a special type of link that the browser pre-fetches and displays in place of the link, but visual browser tend to treat them as part of a compound document (they are more in the PDF market than the hyperlinking market). Front page even uses the term web to mean a self contained compound document.
Received on Saturday, 4 June 2005 10:08:12 UTC