- From: John Foliot - WATS.ca <foliot@wats.ca>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:19:25 -0400
- To: "'Orion Adrian'" <orion.adrian@gmail.com>, <www-html@w3.org>
Orion Adrian wrote: > We're bound to get at least a few differing opinions here, but this is > where I stand. If HTML doesn't allow for any specificity of behavior, > where is this to be specified? It's nice to be able to say, "not my > problem", but we do have to take this into consideration. Whose > problem is it? Scripting. XHTML 2 - semantic logic Scripting (JS?) - behaviour CSS - presentation Yes? No? Maybe? If currently scripting/DOM manipulation is lacking, should that be XHTML's problem any more than it is CSS's problem? If you insist on using behavioural HTML, use an older doc type that allow this: remember that HTML 4.01 is perfectly stable and usable for 99% of current web sites/applications out there today. JF -- John Foliot foliot@wats.ca Web Accessibility Specialist / Co-founder of WATS.ca Web Accessibility Testing and Services http://www.wats.ca Phone: 1-613-482-7053
Received on Monday, 13 June 2005 16:19:40 UTC