- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 07:33:18 +0100 (BST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
> If that's the case, should <h> be required to be the first child of > <section>? If it's not the first child, is it still the heading for any I presume that has been done as a concession to semi-presentational use, such as putting navigation menus before the heading. > > <section> > <h id="logo" src="...">The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)</h> > <h id="slogan">Leading the Web to Its Full Potential...</h> If you did this as Hn, it would be interpreted by user agents that attempt to model the heading structure as an empty section, followed by a section entitled "Leading...". Sub-headings have always been something of a problem, and are one of the cases where <br> has traditionally been used. > <section> > <h1 id="logo" src="...">The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)</h1> > <h2 id="slogan">Leading the Web to Its Full Potential...</h2> No. That has traditionally, from before HTML, been treated as a subsection. > <h id="logo" src="...">The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)</h> > <p id="slogan">Leading the Web to Its Full Potential...</p> The sub-heading isn't body text.
Received on Monday, 13 June 2005 07:19:55 UTC