- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 23:19:53 +0100
- To: "'David Woolley'" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, <www-html@w3.org>
Or maybe 'old really complex standard doesn't take off until it gets simplified, so becoming useable by more people, thus creating a new basis of understanding onto which can then be layered some of the more complex things from the original standard that no-one used'. :) Mark Birbeck CEO x-port.net Ltd. e: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/ b: http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/ Download our XForms processor from http://www.formsPlayer.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: www-html-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Woolley > Sent: 07 June 2005 20:51 > To: www-html@w3.org > Subject: Re: XHTML Modularization and Tables... > > > > with the same ID. There are some attempts underway to produce > > conditional parts of documents, and I would think that this > should not > > be part of XHTML modularisation, but something more > generic, in the way that XInclude is. > > Wasn't that capability thrown out when SGML was simplified to > create XML (marked sections in content)? Seems to me that > some re-inventing of the wheel is going on. (This is fairly > standard standards lifecycle: > new standards arise because the old ones get too complicated. > They cut things back to the essential. Soon thereafter, > people start discovering why the original standard was > complex, without realising that the original one actually > covered their needs.) > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2005 22:20:48 UTC